Re: [netmod] Important: Guidelines for YANG module authors

On 6/10/2017 5:42 AM, Kent Watsen wrote: Yes, let's rewrite 6.23 completely to state more helpfully what's in the guidelines draft. I don't expect the guidelines doc is going to progress independently. Agreed. Regards, B. Kent. // shepherd On Jun 9, 2017, at 1:06 PM, Andy Bierman

Re: [netmod] Important: Guidelines for YANG module authors

Yes, let's rewrite 6.23 completely to state more helpfully what's in the guidelines draft. I don't expect the guidelines doc is going to progress independently. Kent. // shepherd On Jun 9, 2017, at 1:06 PM, Andy Bierman > wrote: Hi, I am

Re: [netmod] Important: Guidelines for YANG module authors

Hi, I am trying to complete rfc6087bis. It has been held up waiting for this draft. It is not clear to me how sec. 6.23 (Operational Data) needs to change. Should the whole section be replaced by an informative reference to this new draft? Andy On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Benoit Claise

Re: [netmod] Important: Guidelines for YANG module authors

Benoit, Thanks for this! WG, Now would be a good time to take a look at, and comment on, draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines also consider how this document impacts draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis (particularly section 5.23). Optimally

[netmod] Important: Guidelines for YANG module authors

Dear all, Now that the new NETMOD and NETCONF charters have been approved, it's time to think about the guidelines for YANG module authors. The Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) addresses the so-called "OpState problem" that has been the subject of much discussion in the