Re: [netmod] LL review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-04

2018-02-12 Thread Andy Bierman
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 04:14:29PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 15:37 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:26:31PM +0100, Ladislav

Re: [netmod] LL review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-04

2018-02-12 Thread Andy Bierman
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:26:31PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > Sec. 1 - YANG library stability > > > > > > > > The text basically says that the YANG library information

Re: [netmod] LL review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-04

2018-02-12 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 04:14:29PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 15:37 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:26:31PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > > > Sec. 1 - YANG library stability > > > > > > > > > > The text basically

Re: [netmod] LL review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-04

2018-02-12 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 15:37 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:26:31PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > Sec. 1 - YANG library stability > > > > > > > > The text basically says that the YANG library information can > > > > change at any time.

Re: [netmod] LL review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-04

2018-02-12 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:26:31PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > Sec. 1 - YANG library stability > > > > > > The text basically says that the YANG library information can > > > change at any time. This has been recently discussed but I > > > haven't seen any conclusion

Re: [netmod] LL review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-04

2018-02-12 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 13:02 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for this review. Comments inline. > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > here is my review of the rfc7895bis document: > > > > *** General comments > > - This revision is a significant

Re: [netmod] LL review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-04

2018-02-12 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi, Thank you for this review. Comments inline. Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi, > > here is my review of the rfc7895bis document: > > *** General comments > - This revision is a significant improvement necessary for > supporting NMDA. However, it is also flexible enough

[netmod] LL review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-04

2018-02-09 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Hi, here is my review of the rfc7895bis document: *** General comments - This revision is a significant improvement necessary for supporting NMDA. However, it is also flexible enough in that it allows for implementing the NMDA rules in an effective way but doesn't preclude