"Peter Kajsa -X (pkajsa - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <pka...@cisco.com> 
wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> RFC7950 section 7.9.2. says that if a “case” statement is omitted
> (i.e. “case” shorthand) and implicit “case” node is created, schema
> node identifiers MUST always explicitly include the implicit “case”
> node identifiers. So the following snippet from yang model (below) is
> valid for Yang 1.1. However, is it also valid for Yang 1.0 ? RFC6020
> is not clear about this and there is no section saying that schema
> node identifiers MUST always explicitly include the implicit “case”
> node identifiers…

Yes, this works the same way in both YANG 1 and 1.1.  The new sentence
was added as a clarification to 7950.



/martin



> 
>     choice my-choice {
>         container implicit-case-container {
>         }
>     }
> 
>     augment "/my-choice/implicit-case-container" {
>         leaf leaf-after-container {
>             type empty;
>         }
>     }
> 
>     augment "/my-choice/implicit-case-container/implicit-case-container" {
>         leaf leaf-inside-container {
>             type empty;
>         }
>     }
> 
> Thanks.
> [http://wwwin.cisco.com/c/dam/cec/organizations/gmcc/services-tools/signaturetool/images/logo/logo_Cisco_Blue.png]
> 
> 
> 
> Peter Kajsa
> Engineer - Software
> pka...@cisco.com<mailto:pka...@cisco.com>
> Tel:
> 
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> 
> 
> 
> Slovakia
> cisco.com
> 
> 
> [http://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif]Think
> before you print.
> 
> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
> sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or
> disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
> please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this
> message.
> Please click
> here<http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html>
> for Company Registration Information.
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to