Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

Gentlemen, ... snip snip... On 2018-03-09 01:40, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: Choice of source port definition using range/operator or referring to a group of source ports, to be added as a future 'case' statement.  - ditto for "or referring to a group of destination ports."  - ditto on both

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

Hi Mahesh, Two instances of <<>> below. Kent // shepherd On 3/14/18, 3:27 PM, "Mahesh Jethanandani" > wrote: On Mar 14, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Kent Watsen > wrote: Hi Mahesh, please look

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

> On Mar 14, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > Hi Mahesh, please look for <> below. > > All, please take a look at the question around renaming the "access-lists" > container. > > Thanks, > Kent > > > > On 3/13/18, 9:46 PM, "Mahesh Jethanandani"

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

On 14.03.18 10:42, Kent Watsen wrote: > > BTW, why is the container called "access-lists" and not > e.g., "acls".  I thought that there was a node-naming idiom along > the lines of "/widgets/widget" for when a list is a descendent of > a container. > >   > > History. When we

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

Hi Mahesh, please look for <> below. All, please take a look at the question around renaming the "access-lists" container. Thanks, Kent On 3/13/18, 9:46 PM, "Mahesh Jethanandani" > wrote: On Mar 13, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Kent Watsen

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

On 14.03.18 10:14, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: > The description under the ‘matches’ container says: > > If no matches are defined in a particular container, > then any packet will match that container. If no > matches are specified at all in an

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

> On Mar 14, 2018, at 8:28 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > > Hi Mahesh, > > Just one point. > > On 13.03.18 18:46, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: >>> or how about "The match criteria can be a multiplicity of criteria, >>> all of which must be true for the match to occur. The match

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

Hi Mahesh, Just one point. On 13.03.18 18:46, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: >> or how about "The match criteria can be a multiplicity of >> criteria, all of which must be true for the match to occur.   The >> match criteria may match against values in the packet header or >> against

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

> On Mar 13, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > Hi Mahesh, > > Please look for below. > > Thanks, > Kent > > > On 3/8/18, 7:40 PM, "Mahesh Jethanandani" > wrote: > > Kent, > > >> On Mar 7, 2018,

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

Hi Mahesh, Please look for below. Thanks, Kent On 3/8/18, 7:40 PM, "Mahesh Jethanandani" > wrote: Kent, On Mar 7, 2018, at 1:55 PM, Kent Watsen > wrote: [To all those that said this

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

Kent, > On Mar 7, 2018, at 1:55 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > [To all those that said this draft was ready, really?] > > > Hi Mahesh, > > Thanks for the update. I found some more issues. Some must be fixed, > others are nits, and might be caught by the RFC Editor. But I

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

[To all those that said this draft was ready, really?] Hi Mahesh, Thanks for the update. I found some more issues. Some must be fixed, others are nits, and might be caught by the RFC Editor. But I think that it's embarrassing to receive comments for such things from the IESG, as is

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-17.txt

This version of the draft addresses comments raised during LC, shepherd review and other comments received during that period. > On Mar 3, 2018, at 2:13 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is