Henrik, Benoit
My first e-mail was sloppily worded. What I meant was RFC in the
Reference clause of a YANG module, since I think that those should be in
the Reference section as well.
I think that it should apply to the Description clause as well, but that
might be more debatable i.e.
Hi Henrik,
It makes sense. Thanks.
Regards, B.
Hi Benoit,
On 2018-02-07 12:56, Benoit Claise wrote:
Hi Henrik,
Could this check be added to idnits?
Yes. I thought I had something like this already, but it was specifically
to look out for mentions of RFC2119.
As you may know, I'm due to
Hi Benoit,
On 2018-02-07 12:56, Benoit Claise wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> Could this check be added to idnits?
Yes. I thought I had something like this already, but it was specifically
to look out for mentions of RFC2119.
As you may know, I'm due to begin a complete rewrite of idnits, from the
Hi Henrik,
Could this check be added to idnits?
Regards, Benoit
I just came across (yet) another example of a reference to an RFC in a
description clause of a YANG module that appears nowhere else in the
I-D.
This seems to be a systematic error that some YANG module authors make;
can the
