Adding Yang Doctors to the thread.
—Tom
> On Oct 17, 2016:4:42 PM, at 4:42 PM, Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> neither RFC6020 nor RFC7950 seem to be explicit about this, so I thought
> I'd ask.
>
> Are recursive, directly or transitively, extensions valid yang?
>
> For example:
>
> module foo {
> namespace "foo";
> prefix foo;
> yang-version 1;
>
> extension a {
> foo:b;
> }
>
> extension b {
> foo:c;
> }
>
> extension c {
> foo:a;
> }
>
> extension r {
> foo:r;
> }
> }
>
> Thanks,
> Robert
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
