Lou Berger writes:
>"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
Thanks,
Phil
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks,
Rob
On 28/11/2016 22:50, Lou Berger wrote:
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of the preparation for WG Adoption
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
[NOTE: Adoption poll will be on the first draft
Lou Berger wrote:
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Adoption
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> [NOTE: Adoption poll will be on the first draft, but authors have agreed
> that -01 WG revision will be based on both.]
>
>
Juerge,
On 11/28/2016 6:41 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:50:55PM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>>
>> As part of the preparation for WG Adoption
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>>
>> [NOTE: Adoption po
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
What is the -01 comment about? AFAIK, we’d post
draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-00 (based on
draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00) following adoption...
Kent // as an author
On 11/28/16, 5:50 PM, "Lou Berger" wrote:
Autho
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:50:55PM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Adoption
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> [NOTE: Adoption poll will be on the first draft, but authors have agreed
> that -01
