On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 03:58:51AM +0300, Vadim Kochan wrote:
Hi,
This is the 1-st try version of how I see the protocol generation API for
the
trafgen util as mz replacement (at least for better performance).
I am sending this just because to get your feedback about conceptual idea,
On 2015-06-30 at 11:41:04 +0200, Daniel Borkmann borkm...@iogearbox.net wrote:
On 06/29/2015 02:58 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
Hi,
This is the 1-st try version of how I see the protocol generation API for
the
trafgen util as mz replacement (at least for better performance).
I am sending
On 2015-06-30 at 12:31:50 +0200, Vadim Kochan vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:41:04AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/29/2015 02:58 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
Hi,
This is the 1-st try version of how I see the protocol generation API
for the
trafgen util as mz
On 2015-06-30 at 12:00:55 +0200, Vadim Kochan vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:41:04AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/29/2015 02:58 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
Hi,
This is the 1-st try version of how I see the protocol generation API
for the
trafgen util as mz
On 2015-06-27 at 11:03:25 +0200, Vadim Kochan vadi...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vadim Kochan vadi...@gmail.com
Print minimum needed packet size in case if validation error.
Applied, thanks Vadim!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
netsniff-ng group.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:41:04AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/29/2015 02:58 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
Hi,
This is the 1-st try version of how I see the protocol generation API for
the
trafgen util as mz replacement (at least for better performance).
I am sending this just because
On 06/29/2015 02:58 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
Hi,
This is the 1-st try version of how I see the protocol generation API for the
trafgen util as mz replacement (at least for better performance).
I am sending this just because to get your feedback about conceptual idea,
and as soon as I got some
