On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:55:01PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/21/2015 07:02 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
Not sure if it is necessary to use libnet by trafgen as it is used by mz
to generate packets ? It will add the new dependency, but seems it can
simplify generation of the proto
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 08:02:40PM +0300, Vadim Kochan wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:10:45AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/20/2015 12:25 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
Ok, how would all of this tie together with flex and bison that we
use for trafgen as parser generator? It looks
On 06/21/2015 07:02 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
Not sure if it is necessary to use libnet by trafgen as it is used by mz
to generate packets ? It will add the new dependency, but seems it can
simplify generation of the proto packets.
Yes sure, we shouldn't depend on it, I think some small
On 06/22/2015 03:37 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
Well, anyway I am trying to implement basic cmdline mz-like proto
generation API with few layered protocols: eth, ip, udp for trafgen
utility.
If I success with this I will share the patch series (I will try to
better split it for easier review).
On 06/19/2015 10:46 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
OK here is another (may be better) design.
Here is an example of the cfg script:
{
eth
{
dst: eth_addr(AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF)
proto: ipv4,
}
ip
{
src: ip_addr(192.168.1.1)
dst:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:08:57AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/18/2015 03:24 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:07:12AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/18/2015 10:57 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
Not yet, but I will try keep thinking about this, and will let know if
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:07:12AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/18/2015 10:57 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
Not yet, but I will try keep thinking about this, and will let know if I
will have some real ideas regarding implementation.
Sounds good!
Some 1st though which I came up is may
On 06/18/2015 03:24 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:07:12AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/18/2015 10:57 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
Not yet, but I will try keep thinking about this, and will let know if I
will have some real ideas regarding implementation.
Sounds
On 06/18/2015 01:30 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
Hi,
I tried to look over mz tool and try to start adding TX fast path as it
is done in trafgen but I am not sure it will be easy, for me it seems the
code is not easy to change.
I have no some objective arguments but I feel that may be it would be
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:51:44AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/18/2015 01:30 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
Hi,
I tried to look over mz tool and try to start adding TX fast path as it
is done in trafgen but I am not sure it will be easy, for me it seems the
code is not easy to change.
I
On 06/18/2015 10:57 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
Not yet, but I will try keep thinking about this, and will let know if I
will have some real ideas regarding implementation.
Sounds good!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
netsniff-ng group.
To
Hi,
I tried to look over mz tool and try to start adding TX fast path as it
is done in trafgen but I am not sure it will be easy, for me it seems the
code is not easy to change.
I have no some objective arguments but I feel that may be it would be
good to start something like pktgen-ng or start
12 matches
Mail list logo
