On 05/05/2015 08:53 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
OK, seems this approach fixes the issue, also I checked that all callers
of pf_socket uses bind_generic or ring_{rx,tx}_setup which does a bind a
socket to a device/proto packet handler:
astraceroute.c:893: static int main_trace(struct
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:39:51PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 12:10 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >On 05/05/2015 11:26 AM, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> >>On 2015-05-02 at 22:54:50 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> >>>On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 07:00:53PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> On
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:39:51PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 12:10 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >On 05/05/2015 11:26 AM, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> >>On 2015-05-02 at 22:54:50 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> >>>On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 07:00:53PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> On
On 05/05/2015 12:10 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 05/05/2015 11:26 AM, Tobias Klauser wrote:
On 2015-05-02 at 22:54:50 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote:
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 07:00:53PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
On 2015-04-29 at 21:18:24 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote:
From: Vadim Kochan
It migh
On 05/05/2015 11:26 AM, Tobias Klauser wrote:
On 2015-05-02 at 22:54:50 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote:
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 07:00:53PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
On 2015-04-29 at 21:18:24 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote:
From: Vadim Kochan
It might be related to the issue #73 noticed by
On 2015-05-02 at 22:54:50 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 07:00:53PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > On 2015-04-29 at 21:18:24 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> > > From: Vadim Kochan
> > >
> > > It might be related to the issue #73 noticed by
> > >
> > > Jon Schipp
> > >
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 07:00:53PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> On 2015-04-29 at 21:18:24 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> > From: Vadim Kochan
> >
> > It might be related to the issue #73 noticed by
> >
> > Jon Schipp
> >
> > where he pointed that netsniff-ng captures some extra packets.
>
On 2015-04-29 at 21:18:24 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> From: Vadim Kochan
>
> It might be related to the issue #73 noticed by
>
> Jon Schipp
>
> where he pointed that netsniff-ng captures some extra packets.
>
> I observed this issue when I captured few Ethernet frames from
> wireless
From: Vadim Kochan
It might be related to the issue #73 noticed by
Jon Schipp
where he pointed that netsniff-ng captures some extra packets.
I observed this issue when I captured few Ethernet frames from
wireless device while I was sniffing Netlink monitor device (!!!),
especially und
From: Vadim Kochan
It might be related to the issue #73 noticed by
Jon Schipp
where he pointed that netsniff-ng captures some extra packets.
I observed this issue when I captured few Ethernet frames from
wireless device while I was sniffing Netlink monitor device (!!!),
especially und
10 matches
Mail list logo
