On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:51 AM, jack scholte <jack.scho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all, > > Great tools but about: > > Trafgen, with -b Option i.e. 100 Mbps results in microbursts. Thus a lot > of packets with a very small intergap (us) and than some msec nothing. > While testing a shaping policy, the queue couldn’t handle the microbursts. > Fortunate I was able to use the intergap Option instead of bit rate. > > Mausezahn: I was not able to use -a with the -b -A -B Option. Also a L3 > dsfield would-be Nice. > > Best regards > > Jack > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "netsniff-ng" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to netsniff-ng+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > Hi Jack! Thank you for suggestions and report! Regarding trafgen -b option you mean that is would be better if the packets delay was better normalized regarding the rate ? Regards, Vadim Kochan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "netsniff-ng" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to netsniff-ng+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
