On 2016-01-28 at 22:04:45 +0100, e.bengts...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Sounds good. Thanks!
Patch now applied, thanks a lot Erik!
Tobias
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"netsniff-ng" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On 2016-01-28 at 13:17:30 +0100, e.bengts...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
> Den onsdag 27 januari 2016 kl. 18:02:23 UTC+1 skrev e.ben...@gmail.com:
> >
> >
> >
> > Den onsdag 27 januari 2016 kl. 16:17:46 UTC+1 skrev Tobias Klauser:
> >>
> >> Hi again
> >>
> >> On 2016-01-27 at
Den onsdag 27 januari 2016 kl. 18:02:23 UTC+1 skrev e.ben...@gmail.com:
>
>
>
> Den onsdag 27 januari 2016 kl. 16:17:46 UTC+1 skrev Tobias Klauser:
>>
>> Hi again
>>
>> On 2016-01-27 at 16:10:30 +0100, Tobias Klauser
>> wrote:
>> > On 2016-01-27 at 14:40:55 +0100, Erik
Den onsdag 27 januari 2016 kl. 16:17:46 UTC+1 skrev Tobias Klauser:
>
> Hi again
>
> On 2016-01-27 at 16:10:30 +0100, Tobias Klauser > wrote:
> > On 2016-01-27 at 14:40:55 +0100, Erik Bengtsson > wrote:
> > > By "start time" I mean file creation
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:12 PM, wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I've googled a bit but not found any good answer to my question. Maybe you
> can help me out?
>
> Currently I'm running five netsniff processes capturing data from five
> different interfaces. It works
On 01/27/2016 02:13 PM, e.bengts...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Is it possible to add some kind of signal interface for controlling start
of new files instead of relying on incoming events?
I have pulled the source and had a look but don't really know how to
proceed...
If you have some cycles, it
Hi again
On 2016-01-27 at 16:10:30 +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> On 2016-01-27 at 14:40:55 +0100, Erik Bengtsson wrote:
> > By "start time" I mean file creation time. It is totally possible to post
> > process all log files and synchronize them using