Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff

2012-01-18 Thread Dan Wendlandt
adurair) > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:13 PM > *To:* Dan Wendlandt; Salvatore Orlando > > *Cc:* netstack@lists.launchpad.net; Soren Hansen > *Subject:* Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff > > ** ** > > In general I completely agree on the VPN service with set of APIs.

Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff

2012-01-16 Thread Debo Dutta (dedutta)
; Salvatore Orlando Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net; Soren Hansen Subject: Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff In general I completely agree on the VPN service with set of APIs. That's the main motivation, we proposed a "Network Extensions Proposal aka Hybrid Cloud Service for Network res

Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff

2012-01-11 Thread Ram Durairaj (radurair)
ary 11, 2012 10:15 AM To: Salvatore Orlando Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net; Soren Hansen Subject: Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff Hi folks, This was one issue that we weren't able to close out during the netstack team meeting yesterday. Debo was traveling and unable to attend the

Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff

2012-01-11 Thread Dan Wendlandt
dopters leverage the functionality. > This is inline with the general approach that every API should be an > extension before it is "core". > > Thoughts? > > Dan > > > >> >> >> ** ** >> >> Salvatore >> >> ** **

Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff

2012-01-10 Thread Dan Wendlandt
ists.launchpad.net] *On > Behalf Of *Robert Starmer (starmer) > *Sent:* 07 January 2012 06:10 > *To:* Debo Dutta (dedutta) > *Cc:* netstack@lists.launchpad.net; Soren Hansen > *Subject:* Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff > > ** ** > > The second route is the right one. IMHO we

Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff

2012-01-09 Thread Salvatore Orlando
@lists.launchpad.net; Soren Hansen Subject: Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff The second route is the right one. IMHO we shouldn't be putting "hacks" into the system when there is a clean scalable and properly modular model by which we can proceed. Getting this done by E, even if it's not pro

Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff

2012-01-07 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Context for openstack-mailing list: This is a thread from the netstack list about integrating VPN capability with Quantum. Wanted larger community feedback. - Hi Debo, Based on our discussion Tuesday, it sounds like some nova folks don't see nova cloudpipe as a path worth inves

Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff

2012-01-06 Thread Robert Starmer (starmer)
The second route is the right one. IMHO we shouldn't be putting "hacks" into the system when there is a clean scalable and properly modular model by which we can proceed. Getting this done by E, even if it's not production ready, is a great goal, and would allow those that can make near term us

Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff

2012-01-06 Thread Debo Dutta (dedutta)
Bump! From: Debo Dutta (dedutta) Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 10:48 AM To: 'netstack@lists.launchpad.net' Cc: Soren Hansen; 'Dan Wendlandt' Subject: cloudpipe stuff Hi After some offline discussions with Dan and Soren it was felt that we need to have this discussion on the ML.

[Netstack] cloudpipe stuff

2012-01-04 Thread Debo Dutta (dedutta)
Hi After some offline discussions with Dan and Soren it was felt that we need to have this discussion on the ML. Context: goal of the CP is to enable auth-ed access to a network managed by Nova /Quantum and not publicly accessible from the Internet. There are 2 ways to do CP: ยท