Re: streetmap.co.uk

2008-12-06 Thread Barry E Allen
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd be all for people never mentioning validators here ever again. They serve no useful purpose for the development of web browsers. Are they useful for anything? Have I been wasting my time making sure that all my web pages

Re: streetmap.co.uk

2008-12-06 Thread Richard Porter
On 6 Dec 2008 Rob Kendrick wrote: I'd be all for people never mentioning validators here ever again. They serve no useful purpose for the development of web browsers. But they do provide a useful purpose for the development of web sites, unless of course you'd prefer to have no standards at

Re: streetmap.co.uk

2008-12-06 Thread Tim Hill
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Snip] I'd be all for people never mentioning validators here ever again. They serve no useful purpose for the development of web browsers. That's such a bizarre statement I would frame it but for the fact this isn't paper.

Re: streetmap.co.uk

2008-12-06 Thread Tim Hill
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Snip missed irony] The end. Let's hope so. -- Tim Hill, www.timil.com

Re: streetmap.co.uk

2008-12-06 Thread Richard Ashbery
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tim Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:03:29 + (GMT) Tim Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: