Ok. Can you also pastebin the output of make Q= in libcss?
Here is make -Q result with GCC: http://pastebin.com/STZ3Uiah
And here is make -Q result with ARM-LINUX-GCC: http://pastebin.com/aVQFdPgm
You probably want CC=arm-linux-gcc and leave HOST_CC alone.
John.
Here is my current
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:18:09PM +0300, Sertac TULLUK wrote:
Result is : http://pastebin.com/W5z2Uett
This looks like you don't have libpng in your cross built environment.
Either add libpng to the cross-env, or put:
override NETSURF_USE_PNG := NO
In your Makefile.config
D.
--
Daniel
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 04:45:55PM +, Tony Moore wrote:
First may I join in thanks to the Developers, for their continued work
on this project. It is greatly appreciated here.
You're welcome :)
NetSurf 2.7 seems to format incorrectly any Google-search results page
(the left hand column
In article 671ef3c551.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk,
Tony Moore old_coas...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
First may I join in thanks to the Developers, for their continued work
on this project. It is greatly appreciated here.
Hear, hear.
On the subject of searching, is there any future plan to
On 19 Apr 2011, Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 04:45:55PM +, Tony Moore wrote:
[snip]
NetSurf 2.7 seems to format incorrectly any Google-search results
page (the left hand column is absent, etc). Does anyone else see
this?
This is expected
On 19 Apr 2011, Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 03:16:03PM +, Tony Moore wrote:
On 19 Apr 2011, Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
[snip]
2.7 uses a different results page for search queries performed
from the welcome page.
Is there
On 19 Apr 2011, Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 04:36:41PM +, Tony Moore wrote:
On 19 Apr 2011, Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
Unfortunately, the 'CSE' version of the search results pages are
somewhat more basic than the normal
In article 2f5e7dc651.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk,
Tony Moore old_coas...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. It's unfortunate that Google has produced a
layout, so out of keeping with its usual design.
I've just donated 6p.
John
