Re: Speed

2011-04-27 Thread Michael Drake
In article adbc5fa551.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote: On 14 Feb 2011 Michael Drake wrote: Restart NetSurf, open a browser window and resize it vertically so only the toolbar is showing. For the first test (thumbnail index) the time is around 6.7s

Re: Speed

2011-04-27 Thread Chris Young
Hi Michael On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:39:23 +0100, Michael Drake wrote: However, reflowing the page made redrawing the entire window necessary. I've just made a change that should reduce the amount of document reflowing we do, and therefore the amount of plotting to screen. I know this wasn't

Re: Speed

2011-04-27 Thread Richard Porter
On 27 Apr 2011 Chris Young wrote: Images without sizes always seem to load stretched initially before they find their proper size. I can see that this will add in some additional processing for resizing images that don't need to be resized - probably causing some document reflow too. Is

Re: Speed

2011-04-27 Thread Michael Drake
In article out-4db86571.md-1.4.17.chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk, Chris Young chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk wrote: Images without sizes always seem to load stretched initially before they find their proper size. Initially, we layout the document before we have the

Re: Speed

2011-04-27 Thread Michael Drake
In article 2a18a0ca51.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote: I don't like it either, especially if the image dimensions are specified. It would be better to truncate or wrap the text if it doesn't fit. Please try r12243. -- Michael Drake (tlsa)

Re: Speed

2011-04-27 Thread Richard Porter
On 27 Apr 2011 Michael Drake wrote: In article 2a18a0ca51.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote: I don't like it either, especially if the image dimensions are specified. It would be better to truncate or wrap the text if it doesn't fit. Please try

Re: Speed

2011-04-27 Thread Dave Higton
In message 51ca8a0eb2t...@netsurf-browser.org Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: Please try r12243. I'd be interested to know the speeds you get No objective tests (hence the unusual snip point), but I have the impression on Slashdot, The Register, etc. that r12243 is