Using version 2.8 (18th Septemeber)and going to the correct location,
which worked before, it shows the correct information for a few
seconds, then quits. I saved the failure log to my temp directory, I
loaded infozip onto the iconbar, I dragged the saved log to it,
Infozip changed from Idle
I ran the html file which was with the message, which appears as an
attchment, in !Pluto, in NetSurf. The BMP file was also an attachment
to the message. NetSurf tried to load the file. End of.
NetSurf has full support for BMP images.
Thanks, John. Noted, but NetSurf clearly doesn't
I ran the html file which was with the message, which appears as an
attchment, in !Pluto, in NetSurf. The BMP file was also an attachment
to the message. NetSurf tried to load the file. End of.
OK. But an html message or web page shouldn't contain BMP images.
On what basis shouldn't
... NetSurf, which has its own routines for BMP decoding[1]. Whatever
ChangeFSI does is not going to affect NetSurf.
However, the test that I did showed that with ImageFS2 running on the
machine, its settings did affect what NetSurf did.
I don't know enough about the mechanics to know
In article 5223f8af84bbai...@argonet.co.uk, Brian Bailey
bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote:
I ran the html file which was with the message, which appears as an
attchment, in !Pluto, in NetSurf. The BMP file was also an
attachment to the message. NetSurf tried to load the file. End of.
OK.
On 18/10/2011 11:25, John Harrison wrote:
... NetSurf, which has its own routines for BMP decoding[1]. Whatever
ChangeFSI does is not going to affect NetSurf.
However, the test that I did showed that with ImageFS2 running on the
machine, its settings did affect what NetSurf did.
I don't
A cheery hand wave to one and all (mostly).
Using NetSurf r13069.
Having got embroiled in a recent thread it did not take too long to
find the NetSurf is OK with BMP objects. (Whether it is a sensible
thing to do is another matter.)
http://www.pittdj.co.uk/tmp/fergus.htm
The oddity occurs on
In article 8889162452.pitt...@iyonix.home,
David Pitt pit...@pittdj.co.uk wrote:
This line added to MimeMap did allow NetSurf to save the BMP as a BMP.
image/bmp BMP 69C .bmp
I already have:
image/x-MS-bmp BMP 69C .bmp
image/x-bitmap
In message 522417ee9djoh...@ukgateway.net
John Williams joh...@ukgateway.net wrote:
In article 8889162452.pitt...@iyonix.home,
David Pitt pit...@pittdj.co.uk wrote:
This line added to MimeMap did allow NetSurf to save the BMP as a BMP.
image/bmp BMP 69C .bmp
I already have:
In article 8889162452.pitt...@iyonix.home,
David Pitt pit...@pittdj.co.uk wrote:
Should this be so? Should this be in MimeMap by default? Could it
have been a factor in the puzzling email thread confusing Pluto?
No idea, but I do have the following in my mimemap file (not that I
put it there
John-Mark Bell j...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 07:37 +0100, Brian Bailey wrote:
[HTML from an email renders without the BMP graphic]
OK. So this has nothing to do with BMP images at all. The bitmap you sent
me renders fine here.
What is happening is that Pluto fails
In article 52240dc1act...@netsurf-browser.org,
Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
In article 522408c273bbai...@argonet.co.uk,
Brian Bailey bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote:
OK. So this has nothing to do with BMP images at all. The bitmap you
sent me renders fine here.
It
[biggish snip}
Not my problem. It was commercial, thus drawing my attention to the
event.
Would there be any point in telling a suit that he's sending out files in
formats he /perhaps/ shouldn't? Only if you can tell him he's losing
potential sales.
Well, in a round about way he was
On 18/10/2011 19:46, Chris Young wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:43:01 +0100, John-Mark Bell wrote:
What is happening is that Pluto fails to rewrite the image reference in
the HTML document, so NetSurf attempts to fetch a file that doesn't
exist, and instead builds an error page, which then
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:35:12 +0100, David J. Ruck wrote:
On 18/10/2011 19:46, Chris Young wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:43:01 +0100, John-Mark Bell wrote:
What is happening is that Pluto fails to rewrite the image reference in
the HTML document, so NetSurf attempts to fetch a file that
On 18 Oct 2011 Brian Bailey wrote:
OK. But an html message or web page shouldn't contain BMP images.
On what basis shouldn't it, please? It's the first time I've seen a BMP
file employed in this way. If this is likely to become a more common
procedure then surely NetSurf developers would
On 19 Oct 2011 Richard Porter wrote:
On 18 Oct 2011 Brian Bailey wrote:
OK. But an html message or web page shouldn't contain BMP images.
On what basis shouldn't it, please? It's the first time I've seen a BMP
file employed in this way. If this is likely to become a more common
procedure
17 matches
Mail list logo
