In article d26c297a52@nails.abbeypress.net, Jim Nagel
nets...@abbeypress.co.uk wrote:
evanal...@talktalk.net wrote on 29 Mar:
How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads
which people haven't snipped repeated again and again possibly be
less annoying than 40
On 3 Apr 2012 evanal...@talktalk.net wrote:
In article d26c297a52@nails.abbeypress.net, Jim Nagel
nets...@abbeypress.co.uk wrote:
evanal...@talktalk.net wrote on 29 Mar:
How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads
which people haven't snipped repeated again and
Quoting evanal...@talktalk.net:
In article d26c297a52@nails.abbeypress.net, Jim Nagel
nets...@abbeypress.co.uk wrote:
evanal...@talktalk.net wrote on 29 Mar:
How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads
which people haven't snipped repeated again and again
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 11:32:53AM +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
On 3 Apr 2012 dave higton wrote:
I have to admit that I can't see the upside of digests, and I can
see a big downside.
They might help to reduce the clutter if you have to use some poxy
Windoze/MuckOS email client or
In article 527a841756evanal...@talktalk.net,
evanal...@talktalk.net wrote:
As I said, its a matter of personal preference. Not everyone wants to
do as you do.
Why so evangelical?
No problem as long as you don't reply to anything. Because when you do,
you're being a nuisance to others.
On 3 Apr 2012 Rob Kendrick wrote:
Less of the jingoism, please. RISC OS is not immune to crap mail
clients. Additionally, this list is for discussion of NetSurf, not
list digests.
Oops, sorry. I saw Messenger at the top and probably thought I was on
the Messenger list (even so..., you
