I've just enabled NetSurf's visited link handling. This allows links that
have been visited to be rendered differently to unvisited links.
It was originally implemented several years ago, but disabled since it had
a detrimental effect on performance.
Since then we've made many improvements to
On Fri, 17 May 2013 13:06:07 +0100, Michael Drake wrote:
It was originally implemented several years ago, but disabled since it had
a detrimental effect on performance.
IIRC it took minutes to display even the Google homepage when this was
initially enabled. I'm happy to report it is not
In article
out-51966c4e.md-1.4.17.chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk,
Chris Young chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk wrote:
except for the Wakefield show link, where I think the initial URL
isn't being remembered by NetSurf, as the link redirects
Yep, it doesn't know about
On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:07:37 GMT, Tony Moore wrote:
#1172 loads in 16 secs, and quits in 26 secs. The closing log is
here https://dl.dropbox.com/u/77062274/Log_1172
Thanks, please try #1175.
#1175 loads in 16 secs, and quits in 3 secs (even after visiting several
websites).
On Friday 17 May 2013 13:06:07 Michael Drake wrote:
Please could people test builds #1177 and #1178 on a variety of pages and
us know how page load times vary? I am particularly interested to hear
from people using old hardware such as RiscPCs, Iyonixes, Ataris, etc.
I quickly tested the
Hope this helps.
System: Iyonix
URL file size: 66k
Site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/
Build #1177: 13.0s
Build #1178: 13.7s
Build #1179: 22.6s
Site: http://slashdot.org/
Build #1177: 8.5s
Build #1178: 8.4s
Build #1179: 25.0s
In article 534d633ccb...@timil.com,
Tim Hill t...@timil.com wrote:
Site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/
Build #1177: 13.0s
Build #1178: 13.7s
Build #1179: 22.6s
Site: http://slashdot.org/
Build #1177: 8.5s
Build #1178: 8.4s
Build #1179: 25.0s
The #1179 results are odd. Was that with
In article 534d692c69t...@netsurf-browser.org,
Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
In article 534d633ccb...@timil.com,
Tim Hill t...@timil.com wrote:
Site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/
Build #1177: 13.0s
Build #1178: 13.7s
Build #1179: 22.6s
Site: http://slashdot.org/
