On 2014-06-25 13:51, Rob Kendrick wrote:
Of course not :) But from the user's point of view, everything does
stop :)
Pesky users... :)
Steve
On 25 Jun at 13:32, Steve (plusnet) st...@revi11.plus.com wrote:
snip of technical discussion
It is hoped that one of the later stages of filesystem improvements
that we've been hosting bounties about on the ROOL site will address
some of these issues, but at the current rate that the bounty
On 2014-06-25 14:57, Tim Powys-Lybbe wrote:
I have intermittently subscribed to a bounty or two.
Rather than hijack this mailing list, you'd be welcome to post these
questions to the ROOL bounty forum:
https://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/8
Cheers,
Steve
On 25 Jun at 15:22, Steve (plusnet) st...@revi11.plus.com wrote:
On 2014-06-25 14:57, Tim Powys-Lybbe wrote:
I have intermittently subscribed to a bounty or two.
Rather than hijack this mailing list, you'd be welcome to post these
questions to the ROOL bounty forum:
Malcolm Hussain-Gambles, on 23 Jun, wrote:
Just for a positive, I have a panda board my Internet connection is
120mbit. I do notice a difference.
The Panda is going to be faster than a Raspberry Pi.
From my understanding and benchmarks the sd card can write at 20MB/sec
and the fastest tcp I
Rob Kendrick, on 23 Jun, wrote:
[snip]
Overall I was not persuaded that the cache results is any meaningful
speed up and could even slow things up, not just on the Raspberry Pi but
also on the Iyonix and VRPC on a Windows 7 laptop with an SSD.
Certainly on UNIX and BeOS, it seems to
On 23 Jun 2014 Chris Young
chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:43:52 +0100, Peter Young wrote:
Thanks, Chris. I've a couple of busy days coming up, with one early
start, but I'll try to save a log after a new day's start-up, and give
some timings of the
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:10:29 +0100, David Pitt wrote:
!Cache on a RamDisc looks much more promising. This is much better, the
improvement is clear, and the machine is not taken over as the cache is
written.
You do realise that this is more work for the computer to do than simply
increasing
Daniel Silverstone, on 24 Jun, wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:10:29 +0100, David Pitt wrote:
!Cache on a RamDisc looks much more promising. This is much better, the
improvement is clear, and the machine is not taken over as the cache is
written.
You do realise that this is more work
Tony Moore, on 24 Jun, wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, David Pitt pit...@pittdj.co.uk wrote:
[snip]
!Cache on a RamDisc looks much more promising. This is much better, the
improvement is clear, and the machine is not taken over as the cache is
written.
NetSurf already has a Memory Cache.
In article mpro.n7mvk5008hres0700.pit...@pittdj.co.uk, David Pitt
pit...@pittdj.co.uk wrote:
Peter Young, on 23 Jun, wrote:
I've been using the disc cache on RISC OS 2.19, ARMini, and I seem to
have found some downsides to it, and I wonder if (a) I'm doing it
correctly and (b) if it's
I've been using the disc cache on RISC OS 2.19, ARMini, and I seem to
have found some downsides to it, and I wonder if (a) I'm doing it
correctly and (b) if it's worth the occasional faster opening of some
sites.
If I load, for instance, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ as the first site
of a
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:58:52 +0100, Peter Young wrote:
If I load, for instance, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ as the first site
of a session, it loads maybe a little faster, but then I get
intermittent hourglass activity for sometimes up to thirty seconds,
during which I can't do anything
Peter Young, on 23 Jun, wrote:
I've been using the disc cache on RISC OS 2.19, ARMini, and I seem to have
found some downsides to it, and I wonder if (a) I'm doing it correctly and
(b) if it's worth the occasional faster opening of some sites.
If I load, for instance,
On 23 Jun 2014 Chris Young
chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:58:52 +0100, Peter Young wrote:
If I load, for instance, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ as the first site
of a session, it loads maybe a little faster, but then I get
intermittent hourglass
On 23 Jun 2014 David Pitt pit...@pittdj.co.uk wrote:
Peter Young, on 23 Jun, wrote:
I've been using the disc cache on RISC OS 2.19, ARMini, and I seem to have
found some downsides to it, and I wonder if (a) I'm doing it correctly and
(b) if it's worth the occasional faster opening of some
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:13:17 +0100, Peter Young wrote:
Thanks, Chris. I've a couple of busy days coming up, with one early
start, but I'll try to save a log after a new day's start-up, and give
some timings of the hourglass activity on the BBC news site. Where or
to whom should I post the
On 23 Jun 2014 Chris Young
chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:13:17 +0100, Peter Young wrote:
Thanks, Chris. I've a couple of busy days coming up, with one early
start, but I'll try to save a log after a new day's start-up, and give
some timings of the
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:04:53PM +0100, David Pitt wrote:
Peter Young, on 23 Jun, wrote:
I've been using the disc cache on RISC OS 2.19, ARMini, and I seem to have
found some downsides to it, and I wonder if (a) I'm doing it correctly and
(b) if it's worth the occasional faster opening
Just for a positive, I have a panda board my Internet connection is 120mbit. I
do notice a difference.
From my understanding and benchmarks the sd card can write at 20MB/sec and the
fastest tcp I can get is 6MB/sec read and that's off a local webserver for
testing purposes.
So I can't see how
Perhaps having scrap and cache is causing issues on the same card?
I use memphis for scrap?
On 23 Jun 2014, Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:04:53PM +0100, David Pitt wrote:
Peter Young, on 23 Jun, wrote:
I've been using the disc cache on RISC OS
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:43:52 +0100, Peter Young wrote:
Thanks, Chris. I've a couple of busy days coming up, with one early
start, but I'll try to save a log after a new day's start-up, and give
some timings of the hourglass activity on the BBC news site. Where or
to whom should I post the
On 23 Jun 2014, Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
[snip]
On RISC OS, the disc cache *may* only be a win for people on slow
connections.
Using RISC OS on a RiscPC, with a slow internet connection, and Cache
enabled, I found that launching half a dozen stories from Google News
caused
23 matches
Mail list logo
