In article , Vince
M Hudd wrote:
> Brian wrote:
> > It does beg the question. What happens when NetSurf runs in VRPC on a
> > Win 7 machine with a multi-core processor? Does VRPC take
Brian wrote:
> It does beg the question. What happens when NetSurf runs in VRPC on a Win
> 7 machine with a multi-core processor? Does VRPC take advantage of
> multiple cores?
This isn't really a NetSurf question since you're asking about VRPC, so I'm
reluctant to answer
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 06:14:29AM +, Brian wrote:
> > NetSurf is single-threaded, by design. It won't take direct advantange
> > of multiple cores. It'll still be faster on those systems which support
> > multiple CPUs, because the OS can run on one while NetSurf runs on
> > another.
>
>
In article <20160325182319.gl23...@platypus.pepperfish.net>,
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 04:58:05PM +, Jim Nagel wrote:
> > Some of the new Arm hardware running RiscOS (e.g. the ArmX6 and
> > Titanium) has a multi-core processor. So far, of
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 04:58:05PM +, Jim Nagel wrote:
> Some of the new Arm hardware running RiscOS (e.g. the ArmX6 and
> Titanium) has a multi-core processor. So far, of course, RiscOS lacks
> the ability to make use of the extra potential.
>
> Question occurs to me: what's the
Some of the new Arm hardware running RiscOS (e.g. the ArmX6 and
Titanium) has a multi-core processor. So far, of course, RiscOS lacks
the ability to make use of the extra potential.
Question occurs to me: what's the situation with the other platforms
on which Netsurf runs -- Amiga, Atari,