Re: unresizable web page (last bank standing)

2016-03-05 Thread Richard Ashbery
In article <89691e5c55@abbeypress.net>, Jim Nagel wrote: > Richard Ashbery wrote on 5 Mar: > > Now downloaded C1 #3433 and image displays correctly. Resizing > > enlarges picture as expected. Text remains same size. > Yes, here too, having newly updated to #3433.

Re: unresizable web page (last bank standing)

2016-03-05 Thread Brian
In article <89691e5c55@abbeypress.net>, Jim Nagel wrote: > Richard Ashbery wrote on 5 Mar: > > Now downloaded C1 #3433 and image displays correctly. Resizing > > enlarges picture as expected. Text remains same size. > Yes, here too, having newly updated to

Re: unresizable web page (last bank standing)

2016-03-05 Thread Jim Nagel
Richard Ashbery wrote on 5 Mar: > Now downloaded C1 #3433 and image displays correctly. Resizing > enlarges picture as expected. Text remains same size. Yes, here too, having newly updated to #3433. So thanks to the Netsurf team for correcting whatever it was. (Now if only the Lloyds suits

Re: unresizable web page (last bank standing)

2016-03-05 Thread Richard Ashbery
In article , Dave Higton wrote: > In message <555bc1e2c8...@timil.com> Tim Hill wrote: > > In article , Jim Nagel > > wrote: > > > Is it something about the coding

Re: unresizable web page (last bank standing)

2016-03-04 Thread Tim Hill
In article , Jim Nagel wrote: > Is it something about the coding of this site or about Netsurf's > rendering of it? Or maybe it's in the CSS of the page? >

unresizable web page (last bank standing)

2016-03-04 Thread Jim Nagel
Is it something about the coding of this site or about Netsurf's rendering of it? Or maybe it's in the CSS of the page? https://www.change.org/p/last-bank-standing-don-t-let-communities-lose-their-only-bank The picture displays so huge as to be unrecognizable pixels; paragraphs of text are a