Style sheets

2010-05-18 Thread Richard Torrens (lists)
Reloading a document does not appear to re-load the style-sheet. Is this intentional, an oversight or a bug? BTW: the work that is being done is impressive. Especially as it's a task which can never be finished. Thanks to all involved. -- Richard Torrens. http://www.Torrens.org.uk for

Re: Style sheets

2010-05-18 Thread Jess Hampshire
In message 51193a8428li...@torrens.org.uk Richard Torrens (lists) li...@torrens.org.uk wrote: Reloading a document does not appear to re-load the style-sheet. Is this intentional, an oversight or a bug? Isn't it adjust for a complete reload, and select for a quick one (presumably

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 18 May 2010 george george.greenfi...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: Since the developers have stated that NetSurf 2.5 will be the last stable RISC OS release, should I continue to download and install test builds from the RISC OS section of the Downloads area? Presumably, at a certain point, these

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread george
In message 20100518172458.4024b...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:35:12 +0100 george george.greenfi...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: Since the developers have stated that NetSurf 2.5 will be the last stable RISC OS release

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Tue, 18 May 2010 18:02:09 +0100 george george.greenfi...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: Can people who keep saying this please stop saying it until we say it. You did say it. OK, the word 'stable' was not used, but implied: see TIB article 'Last RISC OS version of NetSurf announced', dated 14

Re: Style sheets

2010-05-18 Thread Graham Thurlwell
On the 18 May 2010, Jess Hampshire jesshampsh...@googlemail.com wrote: In message 51193a8428li...@torrens.org.uk Richard Torrens (lists) li...@torrens.org.uk wrote: Reloading a document does not appear to re-load the style-sheet. Is this intentional, an oversight or a bug?

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Dave Symes
In article 5119729ccbrh.li...@phone.coop, Russell Hafter - Lists rh.li...@phone.coop wrote: In article 20100518172458.4024b...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net, Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: Where did the developers say this? I don't remember any of us every saying this.

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Steve Fryatt
On 18 May, Tim Hill wrote in message 51196f11fe...@timil.com: In article 56328.82.109.43.222.1274200724.squir...@91.84.211.154, Steve Fryatt li...@stevefryatt.org.uk wrote: [snip] And, for the record, once things have stabilised following 2.5, I hope there will still be work done

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Steve Fryatt
On 18 May, george wrote in message d3906f1951.acl...@tiscali.co.uk: You did say it. OK, the word 'stable' was not used, but implied: see TIB article 'Last RISC OS version of NetSurf announced', dated 14 Jan 2010: Team spokesman Michael Drake said earlier today: NetSurf 2.5 is likely to

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Dave Higton
In message 20100518172458.4024b...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:35:12 +0100 george george.greenfi...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: Since the developers have stated that NetSurf 2.5 will be the last stable RISC OS