Vincent Sanders, on 5 May, wrote:
Further to my previous efforts I have made an attempt to improve the disc
cache performance even more. I would again be grateful if suitably
interested users could try test CI build 2771 or later.
[snip]
I am especially interested in testing from the Iyonix
In article 20150505103028.gg19...@kyllikki.org,
Vincent Sanders vi...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
I am especially interested in testing from the Iyonix as this was
right on the edge of usefulness previously.
Just loaded a few random pages from BBC and from ROOL on the Iyonix.
I did have the
Using a PandaBoard with the cache on a Fat32 formatted SSD (not the
SD card) gave the following:
(663.19) content/llcache.c llcache_finalise 3361: Backing store
average bandwidth 414186 bytes/second
--
Chris Johnson
Further to my previous efforts I have made an attempt to improve the
disc cache performance even more. I would again be grateful if
suitably interested users could try test CI build 2771 or later.
The previous changes switched to using a small number of large files
to hold all the small entries
In article 20150505103028.gg19...@kyllikki.org,
Vincent Sanders vi...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
This change should be beneficial to RISC OS users as filecore is
(apparently) dreadful at this kind of usage pattern.
I wonder if this is because RISC OS files are 'defragmented' all the
time - I
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:48:46AM +0100, cj wrote:
In article 20150505103028.gg19...@kyllikki.org,
Vincent Sanders vi...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
This change should be beneficial to RISC OS users as filecore is
(apparently) dreadful at this kind of usage pattern.
I wonder if this is
In article 20150505103028.gg19...@kyllikki.org,
Vincent Sanders vi...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
Further to my previous efforts I have made an attempt to improve the
disc cache performance even more. I would again be grateful if
suitably interested users could try test CI build 2771 or
In message 20150505103028.gg19...@kyllikki.org
on 5 May 2015 Vincent Sanders vi...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
Further to my previous efforts I have made an attempt to improve the
disc cache performance even more. I would again be grateful if
suitably interested users could try test CI build
