Re: bad linebreaks

On 27 Apr, cj wrote in message <56ef67beabch...@chris-johnson.org.uk>: > In article <9e0265ef56@6.abbeypress.net>, >Jim Nagel wrote: > > Anybody concur with me? > > Yes - this has been present since the dark ages. I thought it had been > reported many years

Re: bad linebreaks

On 27 Apr 2018 Jim Nagel wrote: > Anybody concur with me? Yes I've raised bug reports about it in the past. -- Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/ t: @westernexplorer mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com I don't want a "user experience" - I just want stuff

Re: bad linebreaks

In article <9e0265ef56@6.abbeypress.net>, Jim Nagel wrote: > Anybody concur with me? Yes - this has been present since the dark ages. I thought it had been reported many years ago. -- Chris Johnson Edinburgh

bad linebreaks

I raised a report on the bug-tracker about really bad linebreaks that Netsurf sometimes commits. This isn't a new thing. I'm using #4316 but fault has existed since many many versions ago and as far as I know has never been reported. My theory is that the Netsurf code thinks it's OK to start

Re: Netsurf Disc Cache

In article <56ef43aa6dnets...@avisoft.f9.co.uk>, Martin Avison wrote: > If anyone wants to try my small program which produces file and directory > statistics for the disc cache, plus an obey file which if run will delete > all empty directories, please email me. Yes

Netsurf Disc Cache

I know from previous posts that using the Netsurf v3.7 disc cache on my Iyonix running RISC OS is probably not improving performance, depending on how low my internet speed is. I am using it to gain experience in the hope that newer, faster hardware will bring some performance benefits. After