In message 20150814072335.GB10674@somnambulist.local
on 14 Aug 2015 Daniel Silverstone dsilv...@netsurf-browser.org
wrote:
We've already found what we believe to be a bug in UNIXLib and we are
investingating it -- it can cause the browser to segfault and thus vanish
without apparent error.
In article mpro.nt3akk00k0cd600b9.pit...@pittdj.co.uk,
David Pitt pit...@pittdj.co.uk wrote:
Gerald Dodson, on 13 Aug, wrote:
Has any one else had this version fail?
Try #2911 or later.
Well, http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/athletics/33867962 now seems to be OK
with #2916. Is that the
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
Has any one else had this version fail?
It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're
undergoing a *huge* JS transition and forcing JS on while we do it. If you
encounter issues, turn JS off after loading
On 14 Aug 2015 Daniel Silverstone dsilv...@netsurf-browser.org
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
Has any one else had this version fail?
It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're
undergoing a *huge* JS transition and forcing
Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
Has any one else had this version fail?
It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're
undergoing a *huge* JS transition and forcing JS on while we do it. If
you
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:56:23 +0100, David Pitt wrote:
I should have been clearer, I meant JavaScript itself is working, sites that
crash on RISC OS didn't crash on Ubuntu.
As Rob said -- RISC OS' UNIXLib is suffering a little right now. The JS engine
uses setjmp()/longjmp() to do exception
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:31:36AM +0100, David Pitt wrote:
Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
Has any one else had this version fail?
It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're
undergoing
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:31:36 +0100, David Pitt wrote:
Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
Has any one else had this version fail?
It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're
undergoing a
Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:31:36 +0100, David Pitt wrote:
Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
Has any one else had this version fail?
It is distinctly likely that current CI
Gerald Dodson, on 13 Aug, wrote:
Has any one else had this version fail?
Try #2911 or later.
--
David Pitt
In article 20150814072335.GB10674@somnambulist.local,
Daniel Silverstone dsilv...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
t is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're
undergoing a *huge* JS transition and forcing JS on while we do it. If
you encounter issues, turn JS off after
Gerald Dodson, on 13 Aug, wrote:
Has any one else had this version fail?
Currently NetSurf starts with JavaScript enabled irrespective of any Choices
saved previously. A new JavaScript engine is being incorporated but at the
moment this is work in progress by which I mean it crashes a lot with
12 matches
Mail list logo
