Re: Page which doed not display properly

In article , Jim Nagel wrote: > (Meanwhile my Netsurf "welcome" page does include Tim's welcome > workaround from 2016nov, to indicate Javascript on/off status.) Mine doesn't. Boo, hoo. More details, please. -- Chris

Re: Page which doed not display properly

On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:31:51 + (GMT) "Richard Torrens (lists)" wrote: > If removing _all_ script from a page does not alter the way the page > displays, then the way it displays is nothing to do with the removed > script. > > I would have thought that did not require

Re: Page which doed not display properly

In article , Jim Nagel wrote: > Would be nice to add a colour for ... to the HTML > mode in StrongEd so that JS would immediately jump out at you in a > page where "the html is terrible to decipher". > I think somebody is working

Re: Page which doed not display properly

In article <56d5995dc6...@timil.com>, Tim Hill wrote: > With the luxury of a PC at my elbow, I tend to throw recalcitrant pages > at it rather than try and decipher them. WYSIWYG page design tools, such > as WordPress used to construct Richard's page I woul point out that this

Re: Page which doed not display properly

In article <455569058123901cbf28cd87c0dab...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk>, Jeremy Nicoll - ml netsurf wrote: > > The page still does not display properly - so as I said, it is not a > > J/S > > thing! > That does not follow. Maybe the code you removed was

Re: Page which doed not display properly

In article , Jim Nagel wrote: [Snip] > Would be nice to add a colour for ... to the HTML > mode in StrongEd so that JS would immediately jump out at you in a > page where "the html is terrible to decipher". A workaround - to make your

Re: Page which doed not display properly

On 2018-03-08 12:58, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote: In article <56d58e70b8...@timil.com>, Tim Hill wrote: In article <56d587af09li...@torrens.org>, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote: > http://www.magheragenealogy.org/ > Most of of the page's text does not

Re: Page which doed not display properly

In article <56d59185celi...@torrens.org>, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote: [Snip] > The page still does not display properly - so as I said, it is not a > J/S thing! If you say so. -- Tim Hill timil.com : tjrh.eu : butterwick.eu : blue-bike.uk : youngtheatre.co.uk

Re: Page which doed not display properly

Richard Torrens wrote: >> It is not a J/S thing. But the html is terrible to decipher! Tim Hill wrote on 8 Mar: > It is. The >26 tags would beg to differ. Would be nice to add a colour for ... to the HTML mode in StrongEd so that JS would immediately jump out at you in a page where "the html

Re: Page which doed not display properly

In article <56d58e70b8...@timil.com>, Tim Hill wrote: > In article <56d587af09li...@torrens.org>, Richard Torrens (lists) > wrote: > > http://www.magheragenealogy.org/ > > Most of of the page's text does not display in Netsurf. > > It is not a J/S thing.

Re: Page which doed not display properly

In article <56d587af09li...@torrens.org>, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote: > http://www.magheragenealogy.org/ > Most of of the page's text does not display in Netsurf. > It is not a J/S thing. But the html is terrible to decipher! It is. The >26 tags would beg to differ. The

Page which doed not display properly

http://www.magheragenealogy.org/ Most of of the page's text does not display in Netsurf. It is not a J/S thing. But the html is terrible to decipher! -- Richard Torrens. http://www.Torrens.org for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats and more!