Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
Michael Drakewrote: > On 16/12/15 14:27, Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > > I can reproduce this, but I don't think it's related to my > > problem. I do not get an error, it just starts NetSurf and no > > page is loaded. > Can you reproduce your problem with the NetSurf 3.3 release > version? My problem, the one where uridispatch starts the browser but does not open the website, also fails in NS 3.3. NS 3.3 seems to always open a window with file:///NetSurf:/Resources/en/welcome.html in it, so that opens, but since it always does that, it's not part of the problem. So it does not seem to be version dependent. (I've recently become more active on RISC OS again, so this may well be a problem that has been there for some time. Strange that I'm the only one experiencing it though!) The other problem, with multiple URIDispatch in one line, also behaves identical in NS 3.3. Cheers, Jan-Jaap FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
On 16 Dec, Brian wrote in message <5532ee3585bbai...@argonet.co.uk>: > In article <73bae93255.jan-j...@armx6.gmx.com>, >Jan-Jaap van der Geerwrote: > > Brian wrote: > > > > Not wishing to cause confusion, but why would one wish to work that > > > way, as above? Don't get it at the moment. > > > I don't want to work that way, but this is more or less the way > > Messenger and other applications open links. So by reproducing the > > problem with URIDispatch I take Messenger out of the loop, we know it > > hasn't anything to do with Messenger. > > OK, thanks, Jan-Jaap, understood. Got me worried there. I'll stick with > Pluto. Pluto will very likely be doing exactly the same behind the scenes. -- Steve Fryatt - Leeds, England http://www.stevefryatt.org.uk/
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
In message <50cad93255.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> Peter Youngwrote: > On 16 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: >> Brian wrote: >>> In article , Peter Young >>> wrote: No idea, but I've also never had a problem with clicking on a link in Messenger Pro, unless it's one that NetSurf can't open anyway. Sorry not to be helpful! >>> Also, perhaps not very helpful, clicking on a link in Pluto, so >>> far as I can remember, always works here. >> Are we talking about the same thing here? > Possibly not. I was referring to double-clicking an HTML file on my > hard disc. However ... >> - Quit NetSurf >> - Open a taskwindow >> - Enter: >> *uridispatch http://www.ikke.no/ >> What happens? >> I would expect NetSurf to start and open a window with www.ikke.no. > ... and I've tried that, using both http://www.ikke.no/ and > www.google.co.uk in a taskwindow, with NetSurf not running, and in > both cases NetSurf loads and the page is opened. I have an obey file on my pinboard containing several (6) *uridispatch commands. This worked OK until the RO 5.23 upgrade, after which an error occurred for all but one website from the list - at which point !Netsurf loaded and so did the one site. Loading the AcornURI v1.04 (20 May 2006) © Christian Ludlam at bootup restores expected functionality. Note: if !Netsurf is pre-loaded on to the icon bar before the obey file is executed, all sites loaded as expected - whichever AcornURI version was loaded. Hope that helps pinpoint the prob. ARMX6, RO 5.23 (R-Comp version), latest !Netsurf -- Allan Bennett
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
In messageAllan Bennett wrote: > In message <50cad93255.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> > Peter Young wrote: >> On 16 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: >>> Brian wrote: In article , Peter Young wrote: > No idea, but I've also never had a problem with clicking on a > link in Messenger Pro, unless it's one that NetSurf can't open > anyway. Sorry not to be helpful! Also, perhaps not very helpful, clicking on a link in Pluto, so far as I can remember, always works here. >>> Are we talking about the same thing here? >> Possibly not. I was referring to double-clicking an HTML file on my >> hard disc. However ... >>> - Quit NetSurf >>> - Open a taskwindow >>> - Enter: >>> *uridispatch http://www.ikke.no/ >>> What happens? >>> I would expect NetSurf to start and open a window with www.ikke.no. >> ... and I've tried that, using both http://www.ikke.no/ and >> www.google.co.uk in a taskwindow, with NetSurf not running, and in >> both cases NetSurf loads and the page is opened. > I have an obey file on my pinboard containing several (6) *uridispatch > commands. This worked OK until the RO 5.23 upgrade, after which an > error occurred for all but one website from the list - at which point > !Netsurf loaded and so did the one site. Loading the AcornURI v1.04 > (20 May 2006) © Christian Ludlam at bootup restores expected > functionality. > Note: if !Netsurf is pre-loaded on to the icon bar before the obey > file is executed, all sites loaded as expected - whichever AcornURI > version was loaded. > Hope that helps pinpoint the prob. > ARMX6, RO 5.23 (R-Comp version), latest !Netsurf Following up my own post: the error notice referred to above ie with the OS-supplied AcornURI module) is as follows:- "Cannot open .www.Netsurf.Log for I/O redirection" -- Allan Bennett
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
On 16 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geerwrote: > Brian wrote: >> In article , Peter Young >> wrote: >>> No idea, but I've also never had a problem with clicking on a >>> link in Messenger Pro, unless it's one that NetSurf can't open >>> anyway. Sorry not to be helpful! >> Also, perhaps not very helpful, clicking on a link in Pluto, so >> far as I can remember, always works here. > Are we talking about the same thing here? Possibly not. I was referring to double-clicking an HTML file on my hard disc. However ... > - Quit NetSurf > - Open a taskwindow > - Enter: > *uridispatch http://www.ikke.no/ > What happens? > I would expect NetSurf to start and open a window with www.ikke.no. ... and I've tried that, using both http://www.ikke.no/ and www.google.co.uk in a taskwindow, with NetSurf not running, and in both cases NetSurf loads and the page is opened. Best wishes, Peter. -- Peter Young (zfc Os) and family Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk pnyo...@ormail.co.uk
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
In article <50cad93255.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>, Peter Youngwrote: > On 16 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > > Brian wrote: > >> In article , Peter Young > >> wrote: > >>> No idea, but I've also never had a problem with clicking on a > >>> link in Messenger Pro, unless it's one that NetSurf can't open > >>> anyway. Sorry not to be helpful! > >> Also, perhaps not very helpful, clicking on a link in Pluto, so > >> far as I can remember, always works here. > > Are we talking about the same thing here? > Possibly not. I was referring to double-clicking an HTML file on my > hard disc. However ... > > - Quit NetSurf > > - Open a taskwindow > > - Enter: > > *uridispatch http://www.ikke.no/ > > What happens? > > I would expect NetSurf to start and open a window with www.ikke.no. > ... and I've tried that, using both http://www.ikke.no/ and > www.google.co.uk in a taskwindow, with NetSurf not running, and in > both cases NetSurf loads and the page is opened. Not wishing to cause confusion, but why would one wish to work that way, as above? Don't get it at the moment. > Best wishes, > Peter. Regards Brian
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
Brianwrote: > > On 16 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer > > wrote: > > > - Quit NetSurf > > > - Open a taskwindow > > > - Enter: > > > *uridispatch http://www.ikke.no/ > > > What happens? > > > I would expect NetSurf to start and open a window with > > > www.ikke.no. > Not wishing to cause confusion, but why would one wish to work > that way, as above? Don't get it at the moment. I don't want to work that way, but this is more or less the way Messenger and other applications open links. So by reproducing the problem with URIDispatch I take Messenger out of the loop, we know it hasn't anything to do with Messenger. Cheers, Jan-Jaap FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
In article <73bae93255.jan-j...@armx6.gmx.com>, Jan-Jaap van der Geerwrote: > Brian wrote: > > > On 16 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer > > > wrote: > > > > - Quit NetSurf > > > > - Open a taskwindow > > > > - Enter: > > > > *uridispatch http://www.ikke.no/ > > > > What happens? > > > > I would expect NetSurf to start and open a window with > > > > www.ikke.no. > > Not wishing to cause confusion, but why would one wish to work > > that way, as above? Don't get it at the moment. > I don't want to work that way, but this is more or less the way > Messenger and other applications open links. So by reproducing the > problem with URIDispatch I take Messenger out of the loop, we know > it hasn't anything to do with Messenger. > Cheers, > Jan-Jaap OK, thanks, Jan-Jaap, understood. Got me worried there. I'll stick with Pluto. Regards Brian
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
Allan Bennettwrote: > I have an obey file on my pinboard containing several (6) > *uridispatch commands. This worked OK until the RO 5.23 upgrade, > after which an error occurred for all but one website from the > list - at which point !Netsurf loaded and so did the one site. > Loading the AcornURI v1.04 (20 May 2006) © Christian Ludlam at > bootup restores expected functionality. I can reproduce this, but I don't think it's related to my problem. I do not get an error, it just starts NetSurf and no page is loaded. It happens both with Christian Ludlam's module and the original one. Cheers, Jan-Jaap FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
Brianwrote: > In article , Peter Young > wrote: > > No idea, but I've also never had a problem with clicking on a > > link in Messenger Pro, unless it's one that NetSurf can't open > > anyway. Sorry not to be helpful! > Also, perhaps not very helpful, clicking on a link in Pluto, so > far as I can remember, always works here. Are we talking about the same thing here? - Quit NetSurf - Open a taskwindow - Enter: *uridispatch http://www.ikke.no/ What happens? I would expect NetSurf to start and open a window with www.ikke.no. What actually happens is that NetSurf starts. Running the command when NetSurf runs works fine (i.e. if you run the command a second time). Cheers, Jan-Jaap PS: ikke.no -> "ikke no" which is norwegian dialect for "ikke noe" which means "nothing at all". The text on the website says "What did you expect to find?" - I think it's funny :) FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
On 16 Dec 2015 Peter Youngwrote: > On 16 Dec 2015 Dave Symes wrote: >> In article , >>Peter Young wrote: >> [Snippy] >>> No idea about AcornURI, mine seems to be 0.25, (02 Sep 2013), but I >>> have no idea who wrote it. >> Strange business, the AcornURI I have on my ROOL RISC OS 5.22 install says >> it is 1.04 (May 2006) > Same here. Sorry, senile moment: *h. AcornURI ==> Help on keyword AcornURI Module is: AcornURI0.25 (02 Sep 2013) Commands provided: Desktop_AcornURIURIinfo URIdispatch Best wishes, Peter. -- Peter Young (zfc Os) and family Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk pnyo...@ormail.co.uk
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
Dave Symes, on 16 Dec, wrote: > In article, >Peter Young wrote: > [Snippy] > > No idea about AcornURI, mine seems to be 0.25, (02 Sep 2013), but I have > > no idea who wrote it. > > Strange business, the AcornURI I have on my ROOL RISC OS 5.22 install says > it is 1.04 (May 2006) [snip] We have only just had this discussion about differing URI versions on this mailing list, 8Nov15, "Older Modules in NetSurfs System upgrader" On the Raspberry Pi, AcornURI 0.25 (02 Sep 2013) is in the RISC OS 5.23 ROM, and is also present in !System, but that module is not present at all in OS5.22, neither in ROM nor the OS5.22 !System. AcornURI 1.04 (20 May 2006) by Christian Ludlam was an enhanced version relative to the then current Acorn offerings. It is present in the NetSurf downloads and if that !System is merged then that 1.04 will over-write the ROOL 0.25 if present. NetSurf only rmensures AcornURI 0.12 so on OS5.23 on the Raspberry Pi it will accept the 0.25 ROM version but on OS5.22 1.04 will be softloaded. Until someone says otherwise I believe it is reasonable to say that as far as NetSurf is concerned the two versions on AcornURI are equivalent. Put another way, "It don't matter". HTH, it's all perfectly straight forward. (Well it was until as a last check I had a look on the Iyonix which turns out not to have any AcornURI in the OS5.23 softload ROM and has rmloaded 1.04.) -- David Pitt
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
On 16 Dec 2015 Dave Symeswrote: > In article , >Peter Young wrote: > [Snippy] >> No idea about AcornURI, mine seems to be 0.25, (02 Sep 2013), but I >> have no idea who wrote it. > Strange business, the AcornURI I have on my ROOL RISC OS 5.22 install says > it is 1.04 (May 2006) Same here. Best wishes, Peter. -- Peter Young (zfc Os) and family Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk pnyo...@ormail.co.uk
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
In article, Peter Young wrote: > On 15 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > > Peter Young wrote: > >> On 15 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: [snip] > No idea, but I've also never had a problem with clicking on a link in > Messenger Pro, unless it's one that NetSurf can't open anyway. Sorry > not to be helpful! Also, perhaps not very helpful, clicking on a link in Pluto, so far as I can remember, always works here. > No idea about AcornURI, mine seems to be 0.25, (02 Sep 2013), but I > have no idea who wrote it. > Best wishes, > Peter. Regards Brian
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
In article, Peter Young wrote: [Snippy] > No idea about AcornURI, mine seems to be 0.25, (02 Sep 2013), but I > have no idea who wrote it. Strange business, the AcornURI I have on my ROOL RISC OS 5.22 install says it is 1.04 (May 2006) Dave RISC OS 6.20 is AcornURI 0.12 D. -- Dave Triffid
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
"Chris Young"wrote: > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:08:31 + (GMT), Brian wrote: > > Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A > > further double click is now needed to load the HTML file. > > Previously, a single double click on the file icon was all that > > was needed to load the file into NerSurf. > This was my fault, sorry, should now be fixed. Is this working for anyone? For me it still does not work. I'm on build 3230 which is the latest, at least it was earlier today. Cheers, Jan-Jaap FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
On 15 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geerwrote: > "Chris Young" wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:08:31 + (GMT), Brian wrote: >>> Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A >>> further double click is now needed to load the HTML file. >>> Previously, a single double click on the file icon was all that >>> was needed to load the file into NerSurf. >> This was my fault, sorry, should now be fixed. > Is this working for anyone? For me it still does not work. I'm on > build 3230 which is the latest, at least it was earlier today. Working fine here, same build, ARMX6 and RISC OS 5.23. As far as I remember it's always worked here. Best wishes, Peter. -- Peter Young (zfc Os) and family Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk pnyo...@ormail.co.uk
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
On 15 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geerwrote: > Peter Young wrote: >> On 15 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: >>> "Chris Young" wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:08:31 + (GMT), Brian wrote: > Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A > further double click is now needed to load the HTML file. > Previously, a single double click on the file icon was all > that was needed to load the file into NerSurf. This was my fault, sorry, should now be fixed. >>> Is this working for anyone? For me it still does not work. I'm >>> on build 3230 which is the latest, at least it was earlier >>> today. >> Working fine here, same build, ARMX6 and RISC OS 5.23. As far as >> I remember it's always worked here. > Hmm. I think this issue is talking about something else as I was, > now that I think about it. When NetSurf is not running, and I click > a link in Messenger, NetSurf is started, but the link is not > launched. That's probably a different issue from doubleclicking a > HTML file (which I never really do). > Is it AcornURI that has a problem? > (I seem to be using the one from Christian Ludlam) No idea, but I've also never had a problem with clicking on a link in Messenger Pro, unless it's one that NetSurf can't open anyway. Sorry not to be helpful! No idea about AcornURI, mine seems to be 0.25, (02 Sep 2013), but I have no idea who wrote it. Best wishes, Peter. -- Peter Young (zfc Os) and family Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk pnyo...@ormail.co.uk
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
Peter Youngwrote: > On 15 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > > "Chris Young" wrote: > >> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:08:31 + (GMT), Brian wrote: > > > > Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A > > > > further double click is now needed to load the HTML file. > > > > Previously, a single double click on the file icon was all > > > > that was needed to load the file into NerSurf. > > > This was my fault, sorry, should now be fixed. > > Is this working for anyone? For me it still does not work. I'm > > on build 3230 which is the latest, at least it was earlier > > today. > Working fine here, same build, ARMX6 and RISC OS 5.23. As far as > I remember it's always worked here. Hmm. I think this issue is talking about something else as I was, now that I think about it. When NetSurf is not running, and I click a link in Messenger, NetSurf is started, but the link is not launched. That's probably a different issue from doubleclicking a HTML file (which I never really do). Is it AcornURI that has a problem? (I seem to be using the one from Christian Ludlam) Cheers, Jan-Jaap FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth
Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225
In article, Chris Young wrote: > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:08:31 + (GMT), Brian wrote: > > Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A further > > double click is now needed to load the HTML file. Previously, a single > > double click on the file icon was all that was needed to load the file > > into NerSurf. > This was my fault, sorry, should now be fixed. Ah, well done. Thanks. I was beginning to think that I was having a brain storm or something. Though it wouldn't have been much of a storm at my age. 8-) Brian
Slightly odd behaviour #3225
Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A further double click is now needed to load the HTML file. Previously, a single double click on the file icon was all that was needed to load the file into NerSurf.