from a list-serv that focuses on the linkages between science and
Islamic culture. Kalam has had some interesting insight into how
science has been a propaganda tool (forensics, development of
bio-weapons, the Iraqi radar sensor hoaxes that the U.S. and Britain
used as an excuse to
(via florian schneider)
please forward!
from the independant media studio from geneva where all different media
activists from all over the world are reporting life from the G8 protests
around evian/ genf / lausanne. the police is rioting the building right now.
please watch it and please
(Why you shouldn't believe everything you are told by the Government,
the Tories and the press)
* According to an opinion poll last year, the public believes that the
UK hosts about 23 per cent of the world's refugees, although the real
figure is 1.98%
* In 2002, the United Kingdom was 8th in
It is not only nettime-bold that died, it is the Internet as a whole, if we
have to believe Lawrence Lessig and this reporter Andrew Orlowski of The
Register. But is there any way to make a distinction between 'objective'
circumstances and mass psychology here? Is the collective psyche right? I
Caveat lector: The Register is a decent pub, but everything written by
Orlowski is only useful as virtual toilet paper. Since he started
writing for them he's been focusing so specifically on attacking the
blogging world that I have to wonder if there's some personal history
there, or
folks,
it is worth checking out the list that anna balint and others maintain to
get an idea of what kind of list she has in mind when putting forward her
criticism to nettime:
http://anart.no/sympa/arc/syndicate
as always, i'll go with the moderated version.
greetings, -a
ps: for the record:
Lessig is more subtle, but points us the same way.
When the content layer, the logical layer, and the physical layer are all
effectively owned by a handful of companies, free of any requirements of
neutrality or openness, what will you ask then?
This is no different to any other media.
