nah, i dont think people really think new is 'new' do they? isnt new media
now a label not a literal definition? like net.art or New Zealand?
adam
I'm always amused when I find a new street that isn't. Here we have a
new new street (as opposed to the old new street) that was built around
the
Re: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 Are Flagan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is why your
readymade-for-teacher-conference aphorisms about educators who educate
people to think for themselves stink of the implicit move toward
intellectual narrowing and oppression that in turn invokes your frequent
anti-intellectual
monica ross wrote:
Yes, some people are getting paid and others are paying - in some
countries, including ones rich enough for it to be free to all.
And in some countries, it *is* free for all. Funnily enough, in France
for example, the idea of the 'student as consumer', dictating what he or
for radical
strategies. For intellectuals. I suspect this issue is larger than the
classroom.
Tip top,
nato
-Original Message-
From: monica ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nettime : Re: New Media Education and Its Discontent
Nato Thompson wrote:
(...)
Intellectuals (and I don't have nearly as much antipathy for them as
Mr. Flagan) could really use a PR team. But what would that require?
Possibly having things to say that are important to everyday people.
Maybe having a visible platform to discuss ideas (Possessing
