On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 15:31:11 +0100, Chris Croome [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think that it is a new mode
of production and I also think it is a post-capitalist
mode of production and it is the crystalisation of this
mode of production and the resulting clearer picture of
the form that a new
Felix Stalder wrote:
I totally agree that, from organizational point of view, the points you list
such as open participation are very important. Your list is fully consistent
with my elaborations.
Yes.
The Open Organizations project (http://www.open-organizations.org) is an
attempt to
A further note.
Some proponents of Free Software think it is synonymous with Free
Solutions.
To which, (assuming that functionally either will do) there is one very
simple question that they need to consider:-
Is the likely IT overhead, in term of time, expertise or money involved
in
Hi Ben,
I would be hesitant to define the open source approach
solely or even primarily in terms of the characteristics you mention.
Perhaps I did not put it as clearly as I should have. I did not mean to
characterize the open source approach in terms of its internal
organization. Rather,
Six Limitations to the Current Open Source Development Methodology
The Open Source Approach to develop informational goods has been
spectacularly successful, particularly in the area for which it was
developed, software. Also beyond software, there are important, successfull
Open Source projects
On Thursday 14 August 2003 14:07, Felix Stalder wrote:
The Open Source Approach to develop informational goods has been
spectacularly successful [...]
The boundaries to the open production model as it has been established in
the last decade are set by six conditions characterizing virtually
