Keith Hart wrote:
>"text warez" wrote:
>
>>you completly misunderstood the role of an author. <
>
>There is no identification of the person addressed as "you", but I will
>fill in.
Well, not only does that text lack recipient, if there is no such
thing as author it even lacks a sender. Neithe
Benjamin Greer wrote:
the " founding fathers" who replicated a system where power is invested in
the land owning class...
intellectualism has had a dangerous reputation in the UK since Chartism,
John Stuart Mill, the Workers Educational Association etc since along with
" theory " or " politica
Some of the items in this thread are quite disturbing, such as the thought
that many people are insufficiently intelligent to go to university, but
should rather go to polytechnics or the like:
"Public universities are packed with students who simply should not be in
college. This policy
that ever
All these attacks on "intellectualism" seem to my partially valid, but
generally a little too easy. The same can be said for generalizations
about the American school system. The US higher education system is
extraordinarily vast and modulates depending on its structure. They are
not all "career-bu
There's a lot to digest in Ned's excellent report on Creative Labour, and
I'll be sifting through the correlations between the multitudes and
disorganised creative labour for some time. Even if Ned's somewhat cavalier
methodological orientation grates a little up against Hall et al's classic
introd
"text warez" wrote:
>you completly misunderstood the role of an author. <
There is no identification of the person addressed as "you", but I will
fill in. What interests me is that you think there is only one role of the
author and that whoever doesn't share your idea of it has "misunderstood".
[syntax problem @ nettime -> resent by mod]
if extending the question of 'what is an intellectual?' in
the .US today and in the recent past, it would seem that
the term itself is absurd except in a particular academic
context, as thought is often equated with making money,
and thus people may va
[syntax problem @ nettime -> resent by mod]
> An interesting thread. The real problem with the American educational
> system is that standards are not high enough. Public universities are
> packed with students who simply should not be in college. This policy
US (and many others') educational s
[syntax problem @ nettime -> resent by mod]
Kermit Snelson wrote:
> Patronage is an affair of the élite. If their employees,
> the intellectuals, have higher prestige among the "common people" in
> Europe than they do in the USA, that is probably because titled nobility
> and aristocracy are st
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 05:31:55 +0100
From: Benjamin Geer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kermit Snelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Media Education and Its Discontent
Kermit Snelson wrote:
> Patronage is an affair of the élite. If their employees,
> the intellectuals, hav
Subject: Re: New Media Education and Its Discontent
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 00:37:51 -0500
From: human being <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if extending the question of 'what is an intellectual?' in
the .US today and in the recent past, it would seem that
the term itself is absurd excep
Received: from [205.179.159.102] by web40606.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 08 Oct 2003
22:12:24 PDT
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Morlock Elloi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: New Media Education and Its Discontent
To: nettime - posting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An inter
12 matches
Mail list logo
