> This seems to me to be a rather blatant power grab on the part of the
> E-Flux crew. The E-Flux service (which may or may not be non-profit)
A postscript to that: In ICANN's domain application database, e-flux
is listed as an LLC (Limited Liability Company) with Anton Vidokle
as "Founder and CE
The whole thing strikes me as utterly irrelevant, except for those
who want to make a career or a business in some arcane layers of art
administration connected to large institutional players.
Art-Agenda wrote:
The structure of the internet is about to shift in such a way that
most informati
The rule of the thumb appears to be that anyone deriving income via ICANN is
ultimately a crook.
After .art is cashed in, we will have:
.realart
.postmodern
.abstract
.digitalart
.kunst
.modern
.miro
Or maybe you will trust them, again, that they won't do it?
ICANN simply figured out how to sn
Geert,
e-flux's commercial agenda is clear, and consistent with its
fast trajectory from a free announcements list targeting the art
"community" to a world-wide distributed art-events information service
charging substantial fees per announcement.
If anything, e-flux is/will be interesting for
