Dear Gary,
> On 14 Dec 2017, at 17:06, Gary Hall wrote:
> The only thing I might add would be that, for me, any such subjectivity would
> not assume that the boundaries between the human and nonhuman are drawn
> arbitrarily. Nor that they are largely meaningless. Rather,
Thank you for this post. The analogy to space and property values in
Dubai...perfectly clear. A city surely growing on overinflated speculative
wealth —and the fantasies of power that go with it—-not to mention other
cities, maybe Shanghai, that attract foreign, western capital.
Operative word:
bwo Tetalab List
Original to:
https://hackernoon.com/in-france-cyber-criticism-turns-violent-as-activists-burn-a-fablab-to-protest-the-diffusion-of-4ad378251c5b
In France, cyber criticism turns violent as “activists” burn a fablab to
protest the diffusion of digital culture
What will be the
uno:
> Kenneth Fields:
> > Priestbots would serve as the voice of the never seen/heard/manifest OneBot.
>
> that LOVE started with a touch(screen). by siris, alexas etc. we get used to.
> but, would probably be the first god who actually answers. will be a success
> I guess.
>
Kenneth Fields:
> Priestbots would serve as the voice of the never seen/heard/manifest OneBot.
that LOVE started with a touch(screen). by siris, alexas etc. we get used to.
but, would probably be the first god who actually answers. will be a success I
guess.
I want to LIKE this one.
Where’s the like button on this nettime thing?
If there’s anything ripe for disruption, it’s religion.
What IS religion without the middle man/institution, but a contradiction in
terms.
So not p2p, but p2g-od? God is replaced by Bot - that never manifests…
Now that
Bitcoin seems, to me, to indicate how much criminal, speculative money
there is out there, seeking risk worth taking, rather than "investing"
in a traditional sense. There is simply too much money held by too few
people who now trade it among themselves, rather than seeking to extract
surplus
On 2017-12-13 20:41, Morlock Elloi wrote:
Bitcoin successfully hijacked a sizable amount of public belief, which
underwrites any fiat currency, and it doesn't get more fiat than
Bitcoin.
This is continuation of the phenomena of machine amplification of
human activities; machines do it better