Karl Marx grave has been vandalized ...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dzhn7-7WwAIl8jE.jpg
What does this mean?
If one makes the obvious assumption about who did it, it means that Marx
is increasingly relevant in realpolitik.
The less obvious assumption is a false flag op, to bring Marx back to
the scene.
The point being, the act itself has no inherent meaning. It's just a
canvas. Like so many other acts, it's a propping up of a billboard to
project onto. Once the audience is trained to this, it becomes easy to
mask real acts. The result is that meaning as consensus is gone.
Masses behave like superheated liquid way past it's boiling point,
waiting for something, anything, to explosively boil. The art of
maintenance seems to consist of ensuring that every nucleation appears
suspicious and unreal. Statistics and quantum noise work against the
maintainers, though.
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
# @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: