What do you think of the idea of separatism as being a casino tactic for
creating a set of financial, social and labor crises that set up
conditions for the global plutocracy to systematically game out capital
from the state to the uber-rich until the world is turned into an utterly
balkanized
I just want to make one minor point about this discussion.
England does not "leave Europe". The EU is not "Europe". It's a
political and bureaucratic structure that we can be happy or unhappy
about, and many large and well-functioning European countries are not
part of the EU.
#
Hiya,
> It is remarkable then, how the Guardian newspaper (admittedly by and
> large > a mouth piece of Labour, a kind of British version of the good
> old Pravda) is still discussing the 'future of left politics'
The Guardian is not and never has been a 'mouth piece' of the Labour
party! This
This is what Slavoj Zizek has to say about Brexit, posted on the DiEM25 website
(https://diem25.org/disorder-under-the-heaven/):
Disorder under the heaven
Late in his life, Freud asked the famous question “Was will das Weib?”, “What
does a woman want?”, admitting his perplexity when faced
i just wanted to add a rejoinder on the skewed generational nature of the
brexit vote - yes, the gerontocratic aspect is all too evident, even in
yesterday's spanish elections (where we should pay and homage to catalonia
and expect that pablo iglesias will ponder that it was a bad idea to the a
as they used to say in harlem: WORD
the European Continental Republic needs to happen fast and was greatly
inspired by Ulrike Guérot's political call -
http://www.euronomade.info/?p=6759)
if we want to make it a viable project we should start federating existing
paneuropean movements (blockupy,
Dear Brian, all,
Slowly recovering from the immediate shock of the turmoil across the Canal
(writing from Mokum, Holland), the sense of bewilderment by the string of
events unfolding is hard to put into words - nettime helps a bit to find, and
come to, terms to begin dealing with the
On 26/Jun/16 10:50, Brian Holmes wrote:
The ruse of History exists, and with it, all possibilities for speculation.
Britain as piloted by its ruling classes through all kinds of reversals and
shifts has always been able to draw a new figure of imperial power from the
accumulated reserve of past
On 2016-06-25 22:38, Brian Holmes wrote:
> What's really crucial - and maybe this is what you're getting at,
> Michael - is how do younger people analyze this disastrous situation? Do
> they fall back on the capitalist reflex embodied by Hillary Clinton that
> says, push through the recession to
On 06/26/2016 11:30 AM, Keith Hart wrote:
> I live in Paris and have in-laws in Switzerland, so I pick up more than
> average doses of anti-City rhetoric. A major factor is that I spent a
> quarter century in Cambridge and have a good feel for the British secret
> state and its active wings in
Hi Brian,
I can't offer proof, far from it. It is a story that I have been building
up for decades. No doubt its source is a Manchester man's loathing of how
London stole our industrial revolution and turned it into mercantile
colonial empire, wrecking the British economy in the process. This
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:48:02PM +0100, Richard Barbrook wrote:
>The City boys in the pub last night said that the banks are warning
>their employees that their jobs will be relocated to Frankfurt or
>Dublin if Brexit ever happens for real ...
Hiya,
> The Tory party has been in bed with the City for a century. Expect
> Cameron to be rewarded lavishly for delivering the goods. Many in
> the remain camp claim that Downing Street curbed their efforts during
> the campaign, preventing them from attacking Gove and Johnson directly.
> They
On 06/25/2016 03:56 AM, Keith Hart wrote:
For some time now Europe's political leaders and financial cities have
threatened to abolish the City's immunity. That was the issue. The City
wanted out, but didn't wish to make it obvious. See Nicholas Shaxson's
Treausure Islands for the gruesome
> On 25 Jun 2016, at 03:43, Michael H. Goldhaber wrote:
>
> But what about the fact that those under 50 voted to stay by sizable margins?
this is a fundamental point.
It really looks likes an intergenerational fracture, where aged people
nostalgic of a past world order
"It's about time, Brian"
But time for what? The political agenda that counts in Britain now is
decentralisation, the break up of the United Kingdom and of London's
dominance, led by the Scots of course, but with the reunification of
Ireland now a distinct possibility. There are
But what about the fact that those under 50 voted to stay by sizable margins?
Best,
Michael via iPhone, so please ecuse misteaks.
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Brian Holmes
> wrote:
>
>> On 06/23/2016 11:42 PM, Alex Foti wrote:
>>
>> Either We Do Europe Now or
On 06/23/2016 11:42 PM, Alex Foti wrote:
Either We Do Europe Now or We're Dead - meaning the chauvinists
and the xenophobes will bring us back to the European nation-state
that defends itself against migrants and any threat to its supposed
cultural identity, unless we fight for a European
US deeper colonization of Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand
and lesser arms and bribeable chattels advances in accord with full
spectrum ultra imperial resurgence.
English-dominated communications and responsible cogitation now
affirmed by digital-coded hegemon of Internet, cellphones,
19 matches
Mail list logo