Re: more brexit spam.. sorry

2019-03-13 Thread David Garcia
Sadly it may be a ‘twitter cliche’ but it is (not yet) wrong as it remains the law and so is still the default outcome. I hope that Yvette Cooper’s is successful in proposing an extension givig time to make the new legislation that would take “no deal off the table” but it is not straight

Re: more brexit spam.. sorry

2019-03-13 Thread Sivasubramanian M
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 7:46 AM Keith Hart wrote: > “No deal can’t be taken off the table; it is the table.” You’ll hear > this clever sound bite in Twitter feeds on both sides of the Brexit divide, > but it suffers from the serious defect of being wrong. When we talk about > no deal being the

Re: more brexit spam.. sorry

2019-03-13 Thread Keith Hart
“No deal can’t be taken off the table; it is the table.” You’ll hear this clever sound bite in Twitter feeds on both sides of the Brexit divide, but it suffers from the serious defect of being wrong. When we talk about no deal being the table, we mean that it is the present default position. No

more brexit spam.. sorry

2019-03-13 Thread David Garcia
The UK Parliament just voted to take a Brexit 'no deal' off the table. But it is the law and therefore the default option unless the law is changed. So Parliament's motion means ‘sweet diddly squat’. The problem is actually a category error. You can't take no deal off the table as it is the