On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Douglas La Rocca douglaro...@gmail.comwrote:
There's a distinction between wallets and addresses. Addresses are
traceable and can be analyzed in that manner. Wallets are collections of
addresses which need not ever be publicly associated.
Far from being
On 12/05/2013 01:41 PM, Florian Cramer wrote:
(I also have my doubts that shifting identities really solves the
problem of reverse identification through computational analytics
as it only adds one layer of obfuscation. Live in a small remote
village, for example, and these means won't
Let me know if I'm wrong: one individual may own two or more bitcoin
wallets. And this individual may be a robot or a weird mixture of
flesh and silicon, let say a dog which constantly shift its
identities and deals its bitcoins with some high frequency trading
system. So, obviously cydogs will
I don't know how you figure bots will suck all the money. Bots are made by
humans necessarily, and I can assure you they are quite difficult to make
profitable (unless they directly steal).
The beauty of Bitcoin's complicated mining system is that it fixes the
quantity of money in circulation
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Doug La Rocca douglaro...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know how you figure bots will suck all the money. Bots are made by
humans necessarily, and I can assure you they are quite difficult to make
profitable (unless they directly steal).
I guess that as far as the
