On 06/01/14 01:23 PM, Felix Stalder wrote:
But this rise and decline meme is a typical media cycle.
This.
But, even if nobody would ever use the name Anonymous anymore, and all
the Guy Fawkes masks would rot in drawers around the world, what would
that mean? Decline? Of what exactly? Of an
I've been reading a lot of Zygmunt Bauman lately, and he points out that
there are two control regimes operating at the same time. One is about
keeping people out, and the other is about keeping those who are in in
line. One relies on old-fashioned repression through border guards,
police,
I don't think that this FAZ article makes much sense. First, as David
Garcia pointed out, anonymous never acted as, or claimed to be, a
counter public. It has always been, to varying degrees and by different
people, about direct action and media jamming. It has never a movement
in a classic sense.