On 10/03/14 15:32, Armin Medosch wrote:
is clearly old capital against new capital - the enemy is Google.
so, old capital is a bad thing and new capital is a bad thing, or
what's the moral of this?
or speaking against new capital from the platform of old capital is
bad?
or anything bad about
Writing for the FAZ myself I can assure you, that there is no such
thing as the FAZ. It is a multitude of oppinions, plenty of debates
and highly moble frontlines. There are some arch-conservative editors
and authors who would love to wake up one day and find the internet
gone (mostly in the
While I'd like to chime in with Andreas' fact check of Enzensberger's
ten rules:
For those who aren't nerds, hackers or cryptographers and have
better things to do than keep up with the pitfalls of digitalization
every hour, there are ten simple rules to resist exploitation and
surveillance:
Andreas:
can be effective in any way if performed in such privatistic ways as
suggested in HME's rules.)
Thats what I thought too -- and I think it is completely impossible
and not even a topic worth to be discussed. The article was not even
good as a shameless plug for this terrible
Hi MP,
it is not so difficult. There's capital, and its not homogenous. There are
capitals of a different era and of a different kind - such as industrial,
agro-business, and financial capital. There are different modes of
production and social relations that go with it. It is not about 'for' or
Am 10.03.14 02:58, schrieb Nick:
Quoth Felix Stalder:
Enzensberger's text was just a joke, and the FAZ printed
it because it would stir controversy, not because it had much to
offer intellectually.
Was it really just a joke? I'm not so sure dismissing it as that is
appropriate. Sure it
This is interesting, I've translated it into Spanish.
http://www.mediateletipos.net/archives/26153
(Ø)
_
_blank
www.null66913.net
www.mediateletipos.net
El 02/03/2014, a las 12:00, nettime-l-requ...@mail.kein.org escribió:
...
Today's Topics:
1. Hans Magnus
On 03/Mar/14 04:24, Geert Lovink wrote:
Thanks Cornelia, and Florian for making the translation. I don't mind
the piece but what misses here is a bit of self-reflection of a writer
who has
snip...
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/04/us/monitoring-of-snail-mail.html (U.S.
Postal Service
Thanks Cornelia, and Florian for making the translation. I don't mind the piece
but what misses here is a bit of self-reflection of a writer who has been
inside the media realm his entire life, and who is unable to put his own
'offline romanticism' in the larger picture of the (German) history
I don't think that Enzensberger's text is to be taken seriously - the
tone is so light-hearted that it might well be that it isn't even
intended to be. His suggestions are so far off the social reality of
technical systems and media usage, that it is hard to take them as
anything but the
If you have a confidential message use poetry for encryption.
Moazzam Begg, who spent three years in Guant?namo Bay before being
released without charge in January 2005, began writing poetry as a way of
explaining what he was going through. He knew that everything he wrote
would be censored, so
Since several people asked me off-list about my own opinion on
Enzensberger's piece and my reasons for posting it here, the best answer I
can give is an essay I completed just a few weeks ago for _A Peer-Review
Journal_ (APRJA, http://www.aprja.net), an Open Access journal on digital
culture
12 matches
Mail list logo
