nettime Death of a Hospital

2013-07-31 Thread Alan Sondheim
Death of a Hospital

Today we went to the LICH, Long Island College Hospital, for
neurology issues. The hospital is being closed down so developers
can build condominiums there. In our area there are seven 30+
storey buildings, condominiums scheduled for the next few years.
Current condos go for around $700,000 for a one bedroom. The
hospital has been the scene of protests in recent months; it
serves a large number of neighborhoods and in particular seems to
serve minorities. Patients were removed and sent elsewhere. An
emergency vehicle was turned away as the emergency rooms were
closed down, and someone died on the forty-five minute trip to the
nearest still-functioning place. A mayoral candidate was arrested
along with doctors and others a week or two ago. When we went,
there were, now, security guards everywhere, to make sure there
were no more protests. We were escorted to neurology by one of
them. They were on the street, they were guarding everything. A
receptionist was crying. Our doctor told us how he felt when his
bag and belongings were searched as he reported for duty. They
have maybe a month to clear out. The developers say they're
beautifying the waterfront. The hospital is beautiful, with
trees and gardens. The guards looked like thugs with military
haircuts. Some of them had the word Summit on their uniforms.
Their uniforms were black. I cannot describe the horror of all of
this - after the Barclay Center was built through subterfuge and
lies, including seizing buildings by eminent domain and declaring
the neighborhood blighted (which it wasn't) - now this.
Healthcare is collapsing in NYC; this is the second hospital I
know to shut down. LICH has been around for 155 years. There are
no really close-by others, and to get to others, you now have to
negotiate traffic jams created by the Barclay Center over a mile
away. LICH doesn't make a profit - it loses I think around 15
million a year. Since when is healthcare supposed to make a
profit? We are now at the bottom of developed countries in terms
of healthcare - there was a long report about this online. The
US idea of healthcare is increasingly moving in two directions -
every nicety and technological advance for the rich - and back-
breaking financial burdens for the rest of us. Obamacare doesn't
change this that much and it will probably be defeated anyway. The
horror of people I know struggling to stay alive in the US is
unimaginable. People are dying, are been driven into poverty, as a
result of greed. There's no way out. I wish these developers will
all get sick, unbearably, unbelievably, sick, sick to the point of
death - and beyond - and that they lose all their money and have
to get in lines for emergency care or be turned away at the door.
I wish them hell. They make live miserable for the rest of us. I
hope they go up in flames in this life because I sure don't
believe in hell.


#  distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
#  nettime  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org


nettime why i wrote pgp

2013-07-31 Thread Tilman Baumgärtel

...not me personally, of course.

But Philip Zimmermann.

But in the light of the recent disclosures about internet surveillance 
by the NSA and the British Intelligence (and who knows on who Snowdon 
will spill the beans next - once is in exile), this is pretty 
interesting reading (or re-reading), in regards to your private 
electronic mail (email).


But whoever reads these User´a Guides, anyway? ;)

Yours,
Tilman Baumgärtel

ßß

from :
http://www.philzimmermann.com/EN/essays/WhyIWrotePGP.html

Philip Zimmermann: Why I Wrote PGP

Part of the Original 1991 PGP User's Guide (updated in 1999)

Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that 
you do it.

-Mahatma Gandhi

It's personal. It's private. And it's no one's business but yours. You 
may be planning a political campaign, discussing your taxes, or having a 
secret romance. Or you may be communicating with a political dissident 
in a repressive country. Whatever it is, you don't want your private 
electronic mail (email) or confidential documents read by anyone else. 
There's nothing wrong with asserting your privacy. Privacy is as 
apple-pie as the Constitution.


The right to privacy is spread implicitly throughout the Bill of Rights. 
But when the United States Constitution was framed, the Founding Fathers 
saw no need to explicitly spell out the right to a private conversation. 
That would have been silly. Two hundred years ago, all conversations 
were private. If someone else was within earshot, you could just go out 
behind the barn and have your conversation there. No one could listen in 
without your knowledge. The right to a private conversation was a 
natural right, not just in a philosophical sense, but in a 
law-of-physics sense, given the technology of the time.


But with the coming of the information age, starting with the invention 
of the telephone, all that has changed. Now most of our conversations 
are conducted electronically. This allows our most intimate 
conversations to be exposed without our knowledge. Cellular phone calls 
may be monitored by anyone with a radio. Electronic mail, sent across 
the Internet, is no more secure than cellular phone calls. Email is 
rapidly replacing postal mail, becoming the norm for everyone, not the 
novelty it was in the past.


Until recently, if the government wanted to violate the privacy of 
ordinary citizens, they had to expend a certain amount of expense and 
labor to intercept and steam open and read paper mail. Or they had to 
listen to and possibly transcribe spoken telephone conversation, at 
least before automatic voice recognition technology became available. 
This kind of labor-intensive monitoring was not practical on a large 
scale. It was only done in important cases when it seemed worthwhile. 
This is like catching one fish at a time, with a hook and line. Today, 
email can be routinely and automatically scanned for interesting 
keywords, on a vast scale, without detection. This is like driftnet 
fishing. And exponential growth in computer power is making the same 
thing possible with voice traffic.


Perhaps you think your email is legitimate enough that encryption is 
unwarranted. If you really are a law-abiding citizen with nothing to 
hide, then why don't you always send your paper mail on postcards? Why 
not submit to drug testing on demand? Why require a warrant for police 
searches of your house? Are you trying to hide something? If you hide 
your mail inside envelopes, does that mean you must be a subversive or a 
drug dealer, or maybe a paranoid nut? Do law-abiding citizens have any 
need to encrypt their email?


What if everyone believed that law-abiding citizens should use postcards 
for their mail? If a nonconformist tried to assert his privacy by using 
an envelope for his mail, it would draw suspicion. Perhaps the 
authorities would open his mail to see what he's hiding. Fortunately, we 
don't live in that kind of world, because everyone protects most of 
their mail with envelopes. So no one draws suspicion by asserting their 
privacy with an envelope. There's safety in numbers. Analogously, it 
would be nice if everyone routinely used encryption for all their email, 
innocent or not, so that no one drew suspicion by asserting their email 
privacy with encryption. Think of it as a form of solidarity.


Senate Bill 266, a 1991 omnibus anticrime bill, had an unsettling 
measure buried in it. If this non-binding resolution had become real 
law, it would have forced manufacturers of secure communications 
equipment to insert special trap doors in their products, so that the 
government could read anyone's encrypted messages. It reads, It is the 
sense of Congress that providers of electronic communications services 
and manufacturers of electronic communications service equipment shall 
ensure that communications systems permit the government to obtain 

Re: nettime Death of a Hospital

2013-07-31 Thread David Mandl
I take it you haven't seen this:

=
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324263404578614183479259720.=
html

(Executive summary: Brooklyn-based couple, old friends of and early
investors with Warren Buffett, die leaving close to a billion dollars,
***$135M*** of which they leave to LICH. LICH successfully twists the
conditions of the donation to misuse the money, goes broke anyway due to
corruption and mismanagement.)


On Jul 30, 2013, at 2:29 AM, Alan Sondheim sondh...@panix.com wrote:

 Death of a Hospital

 Today we went to the LICH, Long Island College Hospital, for
 neurology issues. The hospital is being closed down so developers
 can build condominiums there. In our area there are seven 30+
 storey buildings, condominiums scheduled for the next few years.
 Current condos go for around $700,000 for a one bedroom. The
 hospital has been the scene of protests in recent months; it
 serves a large number of neighborhoods and in particular seems to
 serve minorities.

[snip]

--
Dave Mandl
dma...@panix.com
da...@wfmu.org
Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/
Twitter: @dmandl
Instagram: dmandl


#  distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
#  nettime  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org


nettime International Spying History Association

2013-07-31 Thread John Young

http://www.intelligence-history.org/

It's a hoot to read scholarly contributions to legal warrant
NSA and allies' gobbling everything as if concretizing
love of knowledge against terror of ignorant barbarians.

Greece is the ancient and modern navel of spookdom
aka classical philosophy of everything worth knowing
for western wisecracking of codes.

Archeologied by Germany for cultural magnificence
of Götterdämmerung.


#  distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
#  nettime  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org