Morlock,
quoting you here:
<>
we know the ten year plan...move to a privatized government so
interlaced with profit-making that the term "military industrial
entertainment complex" will go out of style and we might need to
replace with "fascist commercial industrial comedy
�����
Σ�ι� 22 �οε 2016 6:46 ��, ο ��ή��η� "Krystian Woznicki"
�γ�α�ε:
Hi nettimers,
the results from the TACIT FUTURES conference are available now: video
interviews with conference guests like Brian Massumi (social thinker),
[This text is an abstract for a larger argument I hope to develop on how
to frame the political character of the crisis, by understanding the
appeal of trump and other stongmen, while trying to avoid the trap of
leftwing nationalism (which I think is largely an illusion). I know it's
very abstract
Thanks a million for your lengthy and thoughtful response, dear Dan!
Exactly what I was looking for. Cheers to lucky Madison for having you
around.
Well, I have been here at Nettime long enough to see people blame
"neoliberalism" for the crisis in Greece when in reality those
I don't think that this list of fears justifies bothering to run the
country. There is not enough money in all of that together, those are
all small incremental operations (and the morality thing will be the
cost center, not the profit one.) Plus there would be no desperate
attacks on the new
Looks promising, Felix. An abstract should be abstract and this one is
not confused, just sometimes elliptical,
Some notes:
The three types of power (hard, soft, neo-liberal) seem to be discrete
categories, but don't their inter-relationships blur those boundaries?
The contrast
January 30, Time To Wake Up
"The media always has taken Trump literally. It never takes him seriously."
(Peter Thiel)
What is beginning to dawn upon Americans is that the exact opposite is true:
That by taking Trump seriously, they completely misunderstood what he was
telling them and vastly
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 01:01:09PM +0100, Alexander Bard wrote:
> Thank you for an excellent expose of your position on world politics and
> your defense of the term "neoliberalism".
I was just exercising empathy towards people that use it more than me. ;)
> To begin with, hardly any