economical needs continue to force people to sell their body out of
despair and not out of consent.
This expresses imo the issue at stake: the lack of a fundamental critic
regarding the economics involved in 'sex workers', for defining the 'need' to
sell once bodily 'labour' out of despair is
MOE-landers: statistical category as a basis for discrimination by Dutch PVV
VVD political parties
February 9, 2012 by Tjebbe van Tijen
The fully illustrated (including videos) and documented version can be found as
always on:
And how exactly is selling access to the pussy fundamentally different
from selling access to the brain?
A precarious intellectual worker may have, out of dispair, to sell
access to his brain to do some inane academic papers to further the
official ideology, or to do some computer programming to
dear nettimers,
here's my take on the endlessly fascinating Anonymous story. Written
for LeMondeDiplo, where it appears in the current issue in a slightly
edited version and under a different title.
All the best.
Felix
Enter the Swarm: Anonymous and the global protest movements
Dear Margaret
You are absolutely right in not buying that last sentence
It should read:
-- So an intimate and inter-personal exchange where the financial
equilibrium is not of primary interest will be preferable and leaves out
the socially and economically consensual dogmatics and leave the
When I hear the word sex trade worker I'm reminded of the phrase
collateral damage. Cleaning up the language doesn't change the
situation. If the word prostitute hurts your feelings - it SHOULD. It's
humiliating work. I agree that it's master-slave, and that's what the
customer is buying -
Dear Morlock,
Do you actually not understand the difference between selling your physical
body and choosing to write inane academic papers?
MM
On Feb 10, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Morlock Elloi wrote:
And how exactly is selling access to the pussy fundamentally different
from selling access to
We must compassionately consider the plight of the inane and opinionated as not
a choice, but as a sad, symptomatic consequence of the capricious capitalist
mechanism. All too frequently, surplus idleness is thrust upon those who are
ill-prepared to receive the burden.
Can you not understand
