Re: nettime Ubiquitous Commons and Stakhanov at transmediale in Berlin

Hello, Since this announcement has been cross-posted I???ll add Daniel Verhoeven response to this as well as my own. FROM DV: Dear All, A good start would be to define ?commons?. The fuziness about the commons is ubiquitous, not the commons. See for a proposal:

Re: nettime Ubiquitous Commons and Stakhanov at transmediale in

On 21/01/15 18:06, allan siegel wrote: A good start would be to define ?commons?. The fuziness about the commons is ubiquitous, not the commons. See for a proposal: https://niepleuen.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/introduction-to-the-commons-and-some-definitions/ Commons are as