On 7 Apr 2016, at 4:15, Florian Cramer wrote:
Berger is by far not the only one with this opinion. After I posted
his article here, WikiLeaks retweeted the link to Nettime's archive
and Berger's piece. Before, Wikileaks tweeted the following (so we can
consider it WikiLeaks' official position
Excellent, Ted.
I think what the "responsible" journalists don't get is that this isn't
about criminal wrong-doing (well some of it is).
The problem at its base isn't about whether folks did or did not break the
law but rather that the law itself is wrong (most certainly the result of
So far Panama Papers have been infinitesimal, ldespite the humongous
bloviation: 184 files, 651 pages, about .0015% of the unsubstantiated
mad-dog frothing 11.5 Million.
Papers hosts claim all froth will not be released, to not madden the public,
not like an unspeakable gutter cur WL, but have
To assure official and congenial approval and financial support for
disclosure it is essential to choral "not like WikiLeaks" then scream
big numbers and Titanic significance, yes dear passengers, the ship is
unsinkable.
Why even the Snowden Unsinkable Molly Brown distances itself from the
Here's a mail I just sent to a list devoted to discussion of
'responsible data.'
Cheers,
T
- - - - - - - 8< SNIP! 8< - - - - - - -
Hi, all --
I appreciate that a forum devoted to responsible data is what it says on
the tin, but I want to question the reflexive assumption that
Alex wrote:
> if europe was over with the end of schengen, now it's deader than
> dead. we're no longer europeans, but french, germans, italians,
> spaniards (and catalunyans), belgians (whatever it means in a country
> split along language lines with autonomous brussels being claimed
> by
> On 5 Apr 2016, at 14:42, Florian Cramer forwarded:
>
>> Panama Papers - not the Scoop but the Flop of the Century
>
> Florian, I'm pretty confident that Jens Berger's eruption won't age
> hold up very well, and I really wonder why you bothered to forward such
> a load of bollocks. And to follow
