On Tue, 3 May 2016, at 01:31 PM, Florian Cramer wrote:
>[...]
>Bitcoin repeats the history of so-called "neoliberalism" precisely
>because it _is_ neoliberalism (in the sense we understand the word
>today), in its most extreme form of libertarian anarcho-capitalism. In
>fact,
Hiya,
> My issue
> with Bitcoin in particular (aside from the fact that it has ended up as
> a speculative investment Ponzi scheme where the first got rich) is that
> it is based on the economics of Friedrich Hayek and his advocacy of the
> gold standard for currencies.
... with added advantage
Molly Hankwitz wrote:
I am interested in this idea of yours of the "flexible self" as I
wrote much about "flexibility" in my critique of wireless imagination
in my dissertation but did not know, at the time about your work
Molly, when I was a kid in the 70s I went to the SNACK concert:
On Mon, 02 May 2016, Florian Cramer wrote:
>In more recent projects, for example crypto currencies,
>Randianism even seems to have taken the upper hand, serving as
>trailblazers for panoptical society of control technologies
>(blockchain) that are quickly adopted by big
Dear Brian,
I am interested in this idea of yours of the "flexible self" as I wrote much
about "flexibility" in my critique of wireless imagination in my dissertation
but did not know, at the time about your work, regrettably. I used the
brilliant work of Melissa Gregg, on the flexible economy
