On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 03:34:05PM +0100, Alexander Bard wrote:
>Excuse me, but what kind of world do you live in?
>A world where all property is owned by nation-state governments as if
>they were all North Korean dictatorships? And the globe is a
>competetion for most evil
"Is you 10th thesis calling for a revolution without using the word.
If so why not? Why avoid the word? Has it become tarnished by
carrying too much historical baggage ? Or does te word simply
not cover what it is you are trying to say?"
Thank you for this question David ~ I
This is fascinating to me having just attended the March here in SF all day
Saturday and having watched, rapt -- the anarchist black bloc on the streets of
D.C. remotely and been a regular, choosy news hound for months.
A couple of points - while I'm not convinced that the Republicans have
Excuse me, but what kind of world do you live in?
A world where all property is owned by nation-state governments as if
they were all North Korean dictatorships? And the globe is a
competetion for most evil between these states and nothing else? Have
you even heard of transnational
TL;DR: If this is already too long, forget it. But here's the bottom line: If
you want to continue debating "foreign cyber-warfare targeting Western
democracies" without looking like an utter clown, you should read the articles
linked below. Specifically (3), which is the most illuminating
Sir James Steuart was a Jacobite exile who brought the term 'political
economy' from Continental Europe to Britain. Almost a decade before
'The Wealth of Nations' he published 'Principles of political economy'
in 1767. For advocating a free Scottish home market with initial
protection from
