Emmanuel Macron can also be understood as a ( status-quo ? )
Neo-Liberal public relations guy, ex-Rothschild investment banker,
creating a new packaging for the same neo-liberal politicians.
Let's see, if and when he gets elected, whom he brings into his
government.
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:1
I'll try a deconstruction from the perspective of having
"designed" a leaderless political organization...
On 04/23/2017 06:54 PM, Florian Cramer wrote:
> 1) The central demand of the 'March for Science', "evidence-based
> policies and regulations", is toxic and dangerous.
This approach has cert
On 04/25/2017 04:34 AM, Eric Kluitenberg wrote:
... the proliferation of automated citation indexes, research and
performance metrics, persisting science publishing oligopolies, a
general war on non-quantiative approaches, a general distrust towards
the Humanities and even the social sciences (a
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Lunenfeld, Peter B.
wrote:
> or as little sense as anything else. If you feel there remains a
> difference, then writing off the M4S comes off as pointlessly fractious
> at best, and ally-denigrating, wheel-churning self-destruction at worst.
Just to be clear: I
Fascinating discussion - this point of Bian seems crucial:
> On 25 Apr 2017, at 05:38, Brian Holmes wrote:
>
> Times change and those who cling to outdated critiques become irrelevant
> if not reactionary. One of the most urgent agendas of the present is the
> transformation of the scientific
When I was reading your conversation, I couldn't help but in my mind
begin to substitute the political parties with football clubs, and
their managers for the candidates. Is Real still alive, now that
Barca has taken a beating? Did we all underestimate Juventus? Will
Chelsea trash Arsenal? Are we g
