Thanks Olia, really looking forward to reading this. R
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:58 PM olia lialina wrote:
> Dear Nettimers
>
> It's a book!
>
> TURING COMPLETE USER – RESISTING ALIENATION IN HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION.
>
> https://books.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/arthistoricum/catalog/book/972
>
The best smart contract code is the cryptokitty code! Information on
cattributes and cloning etc.
But yes. With a few exceptions where people actually encode images into the
hash (see https://cryptograffiti.info) the only thing you own with
cryptoart is the act of ownership itself. People
and a third unnamed
party.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 6:23 PM Felix Stalder wrote:
>
>
> On 14.03.21 14:25, Rachel O' Dwyer wrote:
> > The article includes a discussion of economic *'signalling' *that was
> > prompted by conversations with Ruth Catlow which chimes with Felix'
r
> who has lost the certificate of authenticity wants to know what her Flavin
> is now “worth”. Nothing it turns out; she lost the right to call her light
> bulb a Flavin, or crucially to resell it as such, when she lost the
> certificate of authenticity."
>
> Wishing you well
I haven’t followed the latest surge in NFTs as much as I’d like, but I
wrote this, among other things, on cryptokitties, NFTs and art as a
derivative
https://circaartmagazine.net/a-celestial-cyberdimension-art-tokens-and-the-artwork-as-derivative/
I’m interested in why now though, beyond
vered in clouds of steam, Dr. Van Dervander, "I alone have
> lived to tell the tale" (p. 47), the suit in blue and gray, most of the
> images are pairs.
>
> As punishment for my presumptions here, I will get my copy of Ulysses out
> of basement storage and read it!
>
>
Hi everyone,
I'm starting to think about an elective for postgraduates of studio art and
art theory next semester that looks at network art, and hacktivism after
2015. I think this ties in somewhat with the 'after networks' theme of last
year's Transmediale and also to this year's theme of
Dear all,
>>
>> Maybe I can take the opportunity to plug in to the running discussions
>> by shamelessly plugging the announcement of the next transmediale
>> festival which aims to deal exactly with the topics of networks, as it
>> appeared here as a recurring common conce
you are looking for. I write about “warchalking”
>> and other kinds of social media based information spaces, hacks. From that
>> experience I’d bet you will be best off in the arts. If there is writing
>> being done it would be from groups like the then - headman - Knowb
What characterises media art interventions in the context of ‘surveillance
capitalism’, platforms and the gig economy? Are these practices still
meaningful or, as F.A.T. Lab claimed in 2015, have they lost political
significance in the face of global platforms?
Can we still speak about
Below is a response to Facebook's announcement that it's releasing a
digital currency and wallet.
Rachel
*The Bank of Facebook*
Marshall McLuhan argued that money is communication. This rings
particularly true at a time when so many platforms are entering the
payments space. The US payments
Thanks for sharing this. R
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:50 AM Marcela Okretič
wrote:
> Aksioma – Institute for Contemporary Art, Ljubljana, is glad to announce:
>
>
>
> *Tactics #7*
>
> *CRITICAL ENGINEERING*
>
> *Radical Tools for Interventions in Infrastructure*
>
>
thanks!
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:26 AM David Garcia <
d.gar...@new-tactical-research.co.uk> wrote:
> Felix wrote:
>
> > Mozorov puts lots of emphasis on her lack of engagement with other
> > theories of contemporary capitalism and her unwillingness to considers
> > options beyond the market.
Can't wait to read these.
I just started it last night but already feel like it's very reductive and
suggests that this mode of extractive capital begins in 2001 with Google
where there's a huge body of theory (autonomist Marxism etc) that explores
the rise of these tendencies from the 1960s/1970s
Hi Marc,
Thanks a million for your exciting article. I’m responding hastily because
I have only a little time before crèche pick up and also because that’s the
joy of Nettime J Maybe we can tease some of this out further in subsequent
conversation.
I very much liked this article as a
While I think that it's great to discuss the politics of projects such as
DECODE, I don't see the utility of using a short op-ed written for a
general Guardian-reading audience as the jumping off point for that. Why
not engage with the project's more detailed reports and technical
documentation
I was really sad to read this. I really value the nettime list. I
can't think of another forum that allows me to connect to these issues
on a daily basis. I can't think of another group that I subscribe to
that has the same depth of discussion. That's not to say that these
group discussions and
This is brilliant Brett!
Thanks so much for sharing it.Â
Rachel
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Brett Scott
b.r.scott...@cantab.net wrote:
Hi all,
I decided to build a rather large database of academic research on
Bitcoin. If you'd like to see it, here is the link
18 matches
Mail list logo
