dear dv,
I guess is entirely my fault calling such an OT by divagating...
apologies for my sort-of-ranty way of being somehow wrong, passionate and
definitely thinking like an old-fart about the present and future of net.art in
the age of google-artists.
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, dvyng wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, morlockel...@yahoo.com wrote:
The shift I mentioned is the shift from being managed/herded by a
relatively large number of humans, to being managed/herded by a
large number of machines controlled by a small number of humans, and
the power pyramid becoming a very steep
On 20/07/15 11:02, Jaromil wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, morlockel...@yahoo.com wrote:
The shift I mentioned is the shift from being managed/herded by a
relatively large number of humans, to being managed/herded by a
large number of machines controlled by a small number of humans, and
the
List,
see above. Code is getting everywhere, even the art world is flooded
by code related themes and technicians nowadays. I stopped doing
internet-art or computer-art or net.art already since 10 years,
this is not interesting anymore really.
Why not interesting anymore? Seems like maybe
No, this is spot on I think. On both counts, art labour! Thanks a lot for
this,
seb
Sent from my toaster
On Jul 20, 2015, at 7:02 PM, dvyng dv...@riseup.net wrote:
List,
# distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
# nettime is a moderated mailing list for
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, morlockel...@yahoo.com wrote:
The cause of confusion may be that this (the last few decades) is
probably the first time that power apparatus' enforcement model is
making a big shift from thugs with guns to thugs with compilers.
These are two completely different
[For some, the previous version of the email. was unreadeable. Here it
is again, with appologies. Mods.]
dear Morlock,
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, morlockel...@yahoo.com wrote:
Exonerating makers of malicious tools because they did it only for
the irresistible appeal of money (as opposed to being
dear Morlock,
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, morlockel...@yahoo.com wrote:
Exonerating makers of malicious tools because they did it only for the
irresistible appeal of money (as opposed to being inherently evil and
wanted to screw activists) is ridiculous.
this is not exactly what I intend to say
--
From: mazzetta mazzett...@gmail.com
To: nettim...@kein.org
Sent: 10/07/2015 15:33:31
Subject: Re: nettime Hacked Team
but still omits the venture capitals in the list.
IÂ can solve the mistery, the main financing comes from a venture
capital set by Regione Lombardia
dear nettimers,
most of you may have heard of the Hacking Team scandal
http://www.wired.com/2015/07/hacking-team-shows-world-not-stockpile-exploits/
which is now even among the wikileaks hall-of-fame.
https://wikileaks.org/hackingteam/emails
I feel like sharing some thoughts on this. But first
but still omits the venture capitals in the list.
IÂ can solve the mistery, the main financing comes from a venture
capital set by Regione Lombardia (Milan's region), Finlombarda Gestioni
SGR, sided by a couple of of smaller from Turin area.
More important, if not intelinked,
11 matches
Mail list logo
